Wei Xinyi, Lam Stephanie, Bohrer Benjamin M, Uttaro Bethany, López-Campos Oscar, Prieto Nuria, Larsen Ivy L, Juárez Manuel
Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada.
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Foods. 2021 Oct 20;10(11):2515. doi: 10.3390/foods10112515.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of different low-cost instruments to measure pork colour in comparison to Minolta spectrophotometers and industry subjective standards. Canadian pork colour standards and commercial meat (252 loin chops and 46 tenderloins) were measured using two Minolta (CM 700D) spectrophotometers, four Nix sensors (two Nix Pro II and two Nix QC), and four Spectro devices (two Spectro 1 and two Spectro 1 Pro). Using Bland-Altman plots, all hand-held devices revealed similar performance on colour coordinates, except for the Nix Pro II, which had more variability on * value, and Spectro 1 Pro on * value, when compared to Minolta measurements. Low RSD values (< 5%) were obtained from repeated measurements on Canadian colour standards. The trend of colour coordinates on colour scores (0-6) were similar for all four commercial instruments, except for from Nix Pro and from Spectro 1. The correlation coefficients between subjective standards and colour coordinates from the Nix and Spectro devices were slightly higher than the Minolta spectrophotometers. Even though Nix and Spectro 1 series instruments generated different absolute colour coordinate values on meat samples, these pocket-size instruments presented great reliability to measure pork surface colour. However, operational limitations of the instruments, such as the internal calibration time between samples for the Spectro 1 series, should also be considered.
本研究的目的是评估与美能达分光光度计和行业主观标准相比,不同低成本仪器测量猪肉颜色的性能。使用两台美能达(CM 700D)分光光度计、四个尼克斯传感器(两个尼克斯Pro II和两个尼克斯QC)以及四个光谱设备(两个Spectro 1和两个Spectro 1 Pro)对加拿大猪肉颜色标准和商业肉类(252块猪里脊肉排和46块嫩腰肉)进行测量。使用布兰德-奥特曼图,所有手持设备在颜色坐标上显示出相似的性能,但与美能达测量值相比,尼克斯Pro II在值上的变异性更大,Spectro 1 Pro在值上的变异性更大。对加拿大颜色标准进行重复测量得到了较低的相对标准偏差值(<5%)。除了尼克斯Pro的值和Spectro 1的值外,所有四种商业仪器在颜色评分(0 - 6)上的颜色坐标趋势相似。尼克斯和光谱设备的主观标准与颜色坐标之间的相关系数略高于美能达分光光度计。尽管尼克斯和Spectro 1系列仪器在肉类样品上产生了不同的绝对颜色坐标值,但这些袖珍仪器在测量猪肉表面颜色方面具有很高的可靠性。然而,也应考虑仪器的操作限制,例如Spectro 1系列样品之间的内部校准时间。