Lawal Ismaheel O, Mokoala Kgomotso M G, Kgatle Mankgopo M, Dierckx Rudi A J O, Glaudemans Andor W J M, Sathekge Mike M, Ankrah Alfred O
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 6;11(11):2057. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112057.
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) leads to increased mortality, morbidity, and costs of treatment in patients with immunosuppressive conditions. The definitive diagnosis of IFD relies on the isolation of the causative fungal agents through microscopy, culture, or nucleic acid testing in tissue samples obtained from the sites of the disease. Biopsy is not always feasible or safe to be undertaken in immunocompromised hosts at risk of IFD. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques are, therefore, needed for the diagnosis and treatment response assessment of IFD. The available techniques that identify fungal-specific antigens in biological samples for diagnosing IFD have variable sensitivity and specificity. They also have limited utility in response assessment. Imaging has, therefore, been applied for the noninvasive detection of IFD. Morphologic imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most applied technique. These techniques are neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for the early diagnosis of IFD. Morphologic changes evaluated by CT and MRI occur later in the disease course and during recovery after successful treatment. These modalities may, therefore, not be ideal for early diagnosis and early response to therapy determination. Radionuclide imaging allows for targeting the host response to pathogenic fungi or specific structures of the pathogen itself. This makes radionuclide imaging techniques suitable for the early diagnosis and treatment response assessment of IFD. In this review, we aimed to discuss the interplay of host immunity, immunosuppression, and the occurrence of IFD. We also discuss the currently available radionuclide probes that have been evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies for their ability to detect IFD.
侵袭性真菌病(IFD)会导致免疫抑制患者的死亡率、发病率上升以及治疗成本增加。IFD的确诊依赖于通过显微镜检查、培养或对从疾病部位获取的组织样本进行核酸检测来分离致病真菌病原体。对于有IFD风险的免疫功能低下宿主,活检并非总是可行或安全的。因此,需要非侵入性诊断技术来进行IFD的诊断和治疗反应评估。现有的用于在生物样本中识别真菌特异性抗原以诊断IFD的技术,其敏感性和特异性各不相同。它们在反应评估中的效用也有限。因此,影像学已被应用于IFD的非侵入性检测。计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)的形态学成像技术是应用最广泛的。这些技术对于IFD的早期诊断既不够敏感也不够特异。CT和MRI评估的形态学变化在疾病进程后期以及成功治疗后的恢复过程中才会出现。因此,这些方法可能并非早期诊断和确定治疗早期反应的理想选择。放射性核素成像能够针对宿主对致病真菌或病原体自身特定结构的反应。这使得放射性核素成像技术适用于IFD的早期诊断和治疗反应评估。在本综述中,我们旨在讨论宿主免疫、免疫抑制与IFD发生之间的相互作用。我们还将讨论目前已在临床前和临床研究中评估其检测IFD能力的放射性核素探针。