• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人乳和血浆蛋白质组学样品制备策略的评估。

Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics.

机构信息

Institute of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Mineralogy, Universität Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Center for Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Universität Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Molecules. 2021 Nov 11;26(22):6816. doi: 10.3390/molecules26226816.

DOI:10.3390/molecules26226816
PMID:34833908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8618985/
Abstract

Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy depends much on the biological sample. Here, three approaches were evaluated for the human milk and plasma proteomes. Protein extracts were digested either in an ultrafiltration unit (filter-aided sample preparation, FASP) or in-solution (ISD). ISD samples were desalted by solid-phase extraction prior to nRPC-ESI-MS/MS. Additionally, milk and plasma samples were directly digested by FASP without prior protein precipitation. Each strategy provided inherent advantages and disadvantages for milk and plasma. FASP appeared to be the most time efficient procedure with a low miscleavage rate when used for a biological sample aliquot, but quantitation was less reproducible. A prior protein precipitation step improved the quantitation by FASP due to significantly higher peak areas for plasma and a much better reproducibility for milk. Moreover, the miscleavage rate for milk, the identification rate for plasma, and the carbamidomethylation efficiency were improved. In contrast, ISD of both milk and plasma resulted in higher miscleavage rates and is therefore less suitable for targeted proteomics.

摘要

样品制备是蛋白质组学中最关键的步骤,因为它直接影响到可以可靠鉴定和定量的蛋白质和肽的子集。尽管已经开发了多种高效且可重复的样品制备策略,但它们的适用性和效果在很大程度上取决于生物样品。在这里,我们评估了三种方法用于人乳和血浆蛋白质组学。蛋白质提取物分别在超滤单元(过滤辅助样品制备,FASP)或溶液中(ISD)进行消化。在进行 nRPC-ESI-MS/MS 之前,ISD 样品通过固相萃取进行脱盐。此外,牛奶和血浆样品可以直接通过 FASP 进行消化,而无需进行蛋白质预沉淀。每种策略都为牛奶和血浆提供了内在的优缺点。当用于生物样品等分试样时,FASP 似乎是最有效率的方法,具有较低的错误切割率,但定量重复性较差。由于蛋白质沉淀前处理步骤显著提高了血浆的峰面积,并且显著提高了牛奶的重复性,因此通过 FASP 进行蛋白质沉淀前处理可以提高定量。此外,牛奶的错误切割率、血浆的鉴定率和碳化二亚胺的效率都得到了提高。相比之下,ISD 对牛奶和血浆都导致了更高的错误切割率,因此不太适合靶向蛋白质组学。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics.人乳和血浆蛋白质组学样品制备策略的评估。
Molecules. 2021 Nov 11;26(22):6816. doi: 10.3390/molecules26226816.
2
Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies.基于溶液、FASP 和 S-Trap 的消化方法在蛋白质组学研究中的比较。
J Proteome Res. 2018 Jul 6;17(7):2480-2490. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00235. Epub 2018 May 24.
3
Evaluation of six sample preparation procedures for qualitative and quantitative proteomics analysis of milk fat globule membrane.评价六种用于牛奶脂肪球膜蛋白质组学定性和定量分析的样品制备程序。
Electrophoresis. 2018 Sep;39(18):2332-2339. doi: 10.1002/elps.201800042. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range.评价 FASP、SP3 和 iST 三种方法在低微克范围内进行蛋白质组学样品制备的效果。
J Proteome Res. 2017 Nov 3;16(11):4060-4072. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00433. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Sample Clean-up Strategies for ESI Mass Spectrometry Applications in Bottom-up Proteomics: Trends from 2012 to 2016.自下而上蛋白质组学中电喷雾电离质谱应用的样品净化策略:2012年至2016年的趋势
Proteomics. 2017 Oct;17(20). doi: 10.1002/pmic.201700011. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Filter Aided Sample Preparation - A tutorial.过滤辅助样品制备 - 教程。
Anal Chim Acta. 2019 Dec 20;1090:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.08.032. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
7
Filter-Aided Sample Preparation: The Versatile and Efficient Method for Proteomic Analysis.过滤辅助样品制备:蛋白质组学分析的通用高效方法。
Methods Enzymol. 2017;585:15-27. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
8
Surfactant Cocktail-Aided Extraction/Precipitation/On-Pellet Digestion Strategy Enables Efficient and Reproducible Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Quantitative Proteomics.表面活性剂鸡尾酒辅助提取/沉淀/ pellet 内消化策略可实现高通量定量蛋白质组学中高效且可重现的样品制备。
Anal Chem. 2018 Sep 4;90(17):10350-10359. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02172. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods.探寻通用方法:一种自下而上蛋白质组学样品制备方法的比较研究。
J Proteome Res. 2022 Oct 7;21(10):2397-2411. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
10
Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) for Improved Proteome Analysis of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.用于改进重组中国仓鼠卵巢细胞蛋白质组分析的过滤辅助样品制备(FASP)
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1603:187-194. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6972-2_12.

引用本文的文献

1
Chloroform/Methanol Protein Extraction and In-solution Trypsin Digestion Protocol for Bottom-up Proteomics Analysis.用于自下而上蛋白质组学分析的氯仿/甲醇蛋白质提取及溶液内胰蛋白酶消化方案
Bio Protoc. 2024 Aug 20;14(16):e5055. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5055.
2
Establishing Quality Control Metrics for Large-Scale Plasma Proteomic Sample Preparation.建立大规模血浆蛋白质组学样本制备的质量控制指标
ACS Meas Sci Au. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):442-451. doi: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.3c00070. eCollection 2024 Aug 21.
3
Influence of Mutations and N-Glycosylation Sites in the Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) and the Membrane Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern on Antibody Binding in ELISA.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of different digestion methods for proteomic analysis of isolated cells and FFPE tissue samples.比较不同消化方法对分离细胞和 FFPE 组织样本进行蛋白质组学分析的影响。
Talanta. 2021 Oct 1;233:122568. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122568. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
A Workflow towards the Reproducible Identification and Quantitation of Protein Carbonylation Sites in Human Plasma.一种用于在人血浆中可重复鉴定和定量蛋白质羰基化位点的工作流程。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Mar 1;10(3):369. doi: 10.3390/antiox10030369.
3
Profiling of Low-Molecular-Weight Carbonyls and Protein Modifications in Flavored Milk.
关注的新冠病毒变异株受体结合域(RBD)和膜蛋白中的突变及N-糖基化位点对酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中抗体结合的影响
Biology (Basel). 2024 Mar 23;13(4):207. doi: 10.3390/biology13040207.
4
Comparative proteomics of human milk casein fraction collected from women of Korean and Han ethnic groups in China.中国朝鲜族和汉族女性母乳酪蛋白组分的比较蛋白质组学
Front Nutr. 2023 Jan 23;10:1078355. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1078355. eCollection 2023.
调味乳中低分子量羰基化合物和蛋白质修饰的分析
Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Nov 23;9(11):1169. doi: 10.3390/antiox9111169.
4
Mass Spectrometry-Based Plasma Proteomics: Considerations from Sample Collection to Achieving Translational Data.基于质谱的血浆蛋白质组学:从样本采集到实现转化数据的考虑因素。
J Proteome Res. 2019 Dec 6;18(12):4085-4097. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00503. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Assessment of protein extraction and digestion efficiency of well-established shotgun protocols for heart proteomics.评估心脏蛋白质组学中经过充分验证的鸟枪法蛋白质提取和消化效率。
Anal Biochem. 2019 Aug 1;578:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Diversity of advanced glycation end products in the bovine milk proteome.牛乳蛋白质组中晚期糖基化终产物的多样性。
Amino Acids. 2019 Jun;51(6):891-901. doi: 10.1007/s00726-019-02707-4. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Products of Early and Advanced Glycation in the Soy Milk Proteome.豆乳蛋白质组中晚期糖基化终产物的研究。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019 Jan;63(2):e1800725. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201800725. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Evaluation of sample preparation methods for mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of barley leaves.基于质谱的大麦叶片蛋白质组学分析的样品制备方法评估
Plant Methods. 2018 Aug 25;14:72. doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0341-4. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessment of Sample Preparation Bias in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.基于质谱的蛋白质组学中样品制备偏差的评估。
Anal Chem. 2018 Apr 17;90(8):5405-5413. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00600. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Protein carbonylation sites in bovine raw milk and processed milk products.生牛乳及加工乳制品中的蛋白质羰基化位点
Food Chem. 2017 Aug 15;229:417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.102. Epub 2017 Feb 22.