Li Yan, Wang Huaqing, Furnback Wesley, Wang Bruce C M, Zhu Shuiqing, Dong Peng
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
Elysia Group, LLC, 199 Water St 14th Floor, New York, NY 10038, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;9(11):1368. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111368.
This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) among infants in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Karamay, Qingdao, and Suzhou. A previously published cost-effectiveness model comparing vaccination with PCV13 to no vaccination was localized to the included Chinese cities. A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify age-specific incidence rates for pneumococcal bacteremia, pneumococcal meningitis, pneumonia, and otitis media (AOM). Age-specific direct medical costs of treating the included pneumococcal diseases were taken from the Chinese Health Insurance Association database. The base case analysis evaluated vaccine efficacy using direct effect and indirect effects (DE+ IDE). A subsequent scenario analysis evaluated the model outcomes if only DE was considered. A vaccination rate of 70% was used. The model reported outcomes over a one-year period after it was assumed the vaccine effects had reached a steady state (5-7 years after vaccine introduction) to include the direct and indirect effects of vaccination. Health outcomes were discounted at 5% during the steady-state period. Vaccination with PCV13 was cost-effective in the base case analysis for all included cities with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) ranging from 1145 CNY(Shenzhen) to 15,422 CNY (Qingdao) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. PCV13 was the dominant strategy in Shanghai with lower incremental costs and higher incremental QALYs. PCV13 remained cost-effective in the DE-only analysis with all ICERs falling below a cost-effectiveness threshold of three times GDP per capita in each city. Vaccination with PCV13 was a cost-effective strategy in the analyzed cities for both the DE-only and DE + IDE analyses. PCV13 became very cost-effective when a vaccination rate was reached where IDE is observed.
本研究评估了在北京、上海、深圳、成都、克拉玛依、青岛和苏州的婴儿中接种13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV13)的成本效益。将先前发表的比较接种PCV13与未接种疫苗的成本效益模型本地化到所纳入的中国城市。进行了系统的文献综述,以确定肺炎球菌菌血症、肺炎球菌脑膜炎、肺炎和中耳炎(急性中耳炎)的年龄特异性发病率。治疗所纳入肺炎球菌疾病的年龄特异性直接医疗费用取自中国健康保险协会数据库。基础病例分析使用直接效应和间接效应(DE+IDE)评估疫苗效力。随后的情景分析评估了仅考虑DE时模型的结果。采用了70%的接种率。该模型报告了在假设疫苗效果达到稳态(疫苗引入后5至7年)后的一年期间的结果,以纳入接种疫苗的直接和间接效应。在稳态期间,健康结果按5%进行贴现。在基础病例分析中,对于所有纳入的城市,接种PCV13具有成本效益,每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)范围为1145元人民币(深圳)至15422元人民币(青岛)。PCV13在上海是主导策略——增量成本更低,增量QALY更高。在仅考虑DE效应的分析中PCV13仍然具有成本效益,所有ICER均低于每个城市人均GDP三倍的成本效益阈值。对于仅考虑DE效应和同时考虑DE+IDE效应的分析,接种PCV13在各分析城市中均是具有成本效益的策略。当达到观察到间接效应的接种率时,PCV1变得非常具有成本效益。