Coyle Samantha, Cipra Alli, Rueger Sandra Yu
Montclair State University, Department of Psychology, Montclair, NJ 04043, United States of America.
Governors State University, Department of Psychology, University Park, IL 60484, United States of America.
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Dec;89:51-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
Although research has suggested that youth involved in bullying as victims, perpetrators, or both are at risk for negative outcomes, less work has investigated different patterns in how youth are involved in bullying with consideration for both the role (i.e., victimization and perpetration) as well as type of behaviors experienced (i.e., cyber, verbal, relational, and physical). Using Latent Class Analysis (LCA), the current study investigated patterns of bullying involvement with a sample of 799 middle school students. Results indicated that five classes of bully-involved youth emerged, including a (a) not involved class, (b) traditional bully victim class, (c) verbal bully-victim class, (d) traditional victim-only class, and (e) cyber bully-victim class. Notably, the bully-involved groups demonstrated significantly more internalizing, externalizing, and school related problems than youth not involved in bullying. Implications regarding identification of youth at risk for social and emotional challenges and intervention planning for bully involved youth are discussed.
尽管研究表明,无论是作为受害者、欺凌者还是两者兼具,卷入欺凌行为的青少年都面临负面后果的风险,但较少有研究探讨青少年卷入欺凌行为的不同模式,同时考虑到其角色(即受害和欺凌)以及所经历的行为类型(即网络欺凌、言语欺凌、关系欺凌和身体欺凌)。本研究采用潜在类别分析(LCA),对799名中学生样本的欺凌卷入模式进行了调查。结果显示,出现了五类卷入欺凌行为的青少年,包括(a)未卷入类,(b)传统欺凌受害者类,(c)言语欺凌受害者类,(d)仅传统受害者类,以及(e)网络欺凌受害者类。值得注意的是,与未卷入欺凌行为的青少年相比,卷入欺凌行为的群体表现出更多的内化问题、外化问题和与学校相关的问题。本文讨论了对面临社会和情感挑战风险的青少年进行识别以及对卷入欺凌行为的青少年进行干预规划的相关意义。