Formerly, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, BCM 315, Houston, Texas 77030. Currently, ProPath Laboratories, River Bend Drive, Dallas, TX, 75247, USA.
Margaret M. and Albert B. Alkek Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, McNair Campus 7200 Cambridge Street 8th Floor, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Diagn Pathol. 2021 Nov 27;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13000-021-01169-1.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel endoscopic treatment for early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The western pathologists' experience with ESD specimens remains limited. This study aimed to correlate histopathologic features of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated adenocarcinoma in ESD resections with clinical outcomes to determine whether they aid future management decisions. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 49 consecutive ESD resection specimens from 42 patients with BE-associated adenocarcinoma (24 intramucosal and 18 submucosal EAC) at a single tertiary referral center. Pathologic evaluation included presence of dysplasia, invasive adenocarcinoma, peritumoral inflammation, desmoplasia, lymphovascular and perineural invasion; tumor differentiation, depth of invasion, morphology, and budding; and margin status for dysplasia or carcinoma. Follow up data included endoscopic biopsies in 35 patients and pathology reports of esophagectomies in 11 patients. Poor outcomes were defined as recurrence or residual invasive adenocarcinoma at esophagectomy, metastasis on imaging, or R1 resection in patients undergoing ESD for tumor debulking. RESULTS: Two patients (8%) with intramucosal adenocarcinoma and 9 patients (50%) with submucosal adenocarcinoma had poor outcomes. Histopathologic features associated with poor outcomes included poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, submucosal invasion > 500 μm, tumor budding, and tubuloinfiltrative histologic pattern. Four patients had positive deep margin away from the deepest tumor invasion and did not show residual tumor on follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validated European Society of Gastroenterology (ESGE) guidelines of high-risk pathologic features for additional therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma and identified tumor budding frequently in association with other high-risk features. Positive deep margin distant from deepest tumor invasion could be procedural and warrants endoscopic correlation for management.
背景:内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种治疗早期食管腺癌(EAC)的新型内镜治疗方法。西方病理学家对 ESD 标本的经验仍然有限。本研究旨在将 ESD 切除标本中与 Barrett 食管(BE)相关的腺癌的组织病理学特征与临床结果相关联,以确定它们是否有助于未来的管理决策。
方法:我们在一家三级转诊中心回顾性评估了 42 例 BE 相关腺癌(24 例黏膜内和 18 例黏膜下 EAC)患者的 49 例连续 ESD 切除标本。病理评估包括存在异型增生、浸润性腺癌、肿瘤周围炎症、纤维变性、淋巴管和神经周围侵犯;肿瘤分化、浸润深度、形态和芽生;以及异型增生或癌的切缘状态。随访数据包括 35 例患者的内镜活检和 11 例患者的食管切除术病理报告。不良结局定义为食管切除术时复发或残留浸润性腺癌、影像学转移或 ESD 用于肿瘤减瘤术时 R1 切除。
结果:2 例(8%)黏膜内腺癌和 9 例(50%)黏膜下腺癌患者出现不良结局。与不良结局相关的组织病理学特征包括低分化、淋巴管侵犯、黏膜下侵犯>500μm、肿瘤芽生和管状浸润性组织学模式。4 例深部切缘阳性且远离肿瘤最深浸润处,随访未发现残留肿瘤。
结论:我们的结果验证了欧洲胃肠病学协会(ESGE)关于食管腺癌额外治疗的高危病理特征的指南,并发现肿瘤芽生常与其他高危特征相关。远离肿瘤最深浸润处的深部切缘阳性可能是操作上的,需要内镜相关性来进行管理。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021-4
World J Gastroenterol. 2013-3-7
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024-9
Cancers (Basel). 2024-1-30
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022