JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Value Health. 2021 Dec;24(12):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
Caring for persons with dementia is a heavy burden for informal caregivers. This study aimed to appraise the economic evidence of interventions supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia.
Literature was searched, and trial-based studies evaluating the costs and effects of interventions supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia were included. Cost data were analyzed from both healthcare and societal perspectives. Random-effects models were used to synthesize cost and effect data, based on mean differences (MDs) or standardized MDs.
Of 33 eligible studies identified from 48 588 records, 14 (42.4%) showed net savings in total cost regardless of analytical perspectives. Among 22 studies included in meta-analyses, caregiver-focused psychosocial interventions showed improvements in caregivers' psychological health (n = 4; standardized MD 0.240; 95% confidence interval 0.094-0.387); nevertheless, the increases in societal cost were significant (n = 5; MD 3144; 95% confidence interval 922-5366). Psychological intervention and behavioral management engaging patient-caregiver dyads showed positive effects on caregivers' subjective burden, also with increases in total cost. Subgroup analyses indicated that the inclusion of different intervention components, the caregiver characteristics, and the follow-up periods could affect the costs and effects of interventions supporting informal caregivers.
Psychosocial interventions directed at informal caregivers and dyad-based psychological and behavioral interventions are effective but also expensive. The use of these interventions depends on the society's willingness to pay. More comprehensive economic evidence of interventions supporting informal caregivers is required, and the design of intervention should focus more on different intervention components, characteristics of patients and caregivers, and healthcare systems.
照顾痴呆症患者给非专业照护者带来了沉重的负担。本研究旨在评价支持痴呆症患者非专业照护者的干预措施的经济证据。
检索文献,纳入评估支持痴呆症患者非专业照护者的干预措施的成本和效果的试验研究。从医疗保健和社会两个角度分析成本数据。基于均数差值(MD)或标准化 MD,采用随机效应模型综合成本和效果数据。
从 48588 条记录中确定了 33 项符合条件的研究,其中 14 项(42.4%)无论从分析角度如何,总费用均有净节省。在纳入荟萃分析的 22 项研究中,以照护者为中心的心理社会干预措施改善了照护者的心理健康(n=4;标准化 MD 0.240;95%置信区间 0.094-0.387);然而,社会成本的增加是显著的(n=5;MD 3144;95%置信区间 922-5366)。涉及患者-照护者双方的心理干预和行为管理干预对照护者的主观负担也有积极影响,同时也增加了总费用。亚组分析表明,干预措施中包含不同的干预内容、照护者特征以及随访时间可能会影响支持非专业照护者的干预措施的成本和效果。
针对非专业照护者的心理社会干预和以照护者-患者双方为基础的心理和行为干预措施是有效的,但也很昂贵。这些干预措施的使用取决于社会的支付意愿。需要更全面的支持非专业照护者的干预措施的经济证据,干预措施的设计应更加关注不同的干预内容、患者和照护者的特征以及医疗保健系统。