Cork University Dental School & Hospital, University College Cork, Ireland.
Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, MI, Italy.
J Dent. 2022 Jan;116:103906. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103906. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) operative training using validated performance metrics, by comparing this to standard, conventional training methods.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Study quality was assessed using the MERSQI tool and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results were pooled using biased corrected standardized mean difference and ratio-of-means (ROM). Summary effects were evaluated using a series of fixed and random effects models. The primary outcome was the number of procedural errors performed comparing PBP and non-PBP-based training pathways. In quantitative synthesis testing for procedural errors, a pooled meta-analysis on 87 trainees was conducted using random-effects models. In a ROM analysis, PBP was estimated to reduce the mean rate of errors by 62%, when compared to standard training (ROM 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25; 0.58; p < 0.001) Sources: The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE and Cochrane library's CENTRAL were searched from inception to 8/11/2021. Filters activated were Randomized Controlled trials, clinical trial.
13 studies were included for review with 11 included in the quantitative synthesis from 174 potentially relevant publications identified by the search strategy. Main inclusion criteria were studies comparing standard surgical/operative training with proficiency-based simulation training using validated metrics based on expert performance.
Our meta-analysis found that PBP training improved trainees' performances, by decreasing procedural errors. There is sufficient evidence to explore PBP training for use in dental skills training. PBP training was estimated to reduce the mean rate of operative errors by 62%, when compared to standard training. Given that there is a direct correlation between operative skill and patient outcomes, these data suggest that there is sufficient evidence to explore PBP training for use in dental skills training.
通过比较基于熟练程度的进展(PBP)手术训练与标准常规训练方法,使用经过验证的绩效指标来评估其效果。
本系统评价是按照透明系统评价和荟萃分析报告(PRISMA)的指南进行的。使用 MERSQI 工具和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。使用偏倚校正标准化均数差和比值均数(ROM)来汇总结果。使用一系列固定效应模型和随机效应模型评估汇总效应。主要结果是比较 PBP 和非 PBP 训练途径的操作错误数量。在对操作错误进行的定量综合测试中,使用随机效应模型对 87 名受训者进行了汇总荟萃分析。在 ROM 分析中,与标准训练相比,PBP 估计可将错误发生率平均降低 62%(ROM 0.38,95%CI:0.25;0.58;p<0.001)。
从成立到 2021 年 8 月 11 日,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆的 CENTRAL 电子数据库。激活的过滤器为随机对照试验、临床试验。
从 174 篇潜在相关文献中确定了 13 项研究进行综述,其中 11 项研究纳入定量综合分析。主要纳入标准是比较基于专家表现的标准手术/操作训练与基于熟练度的模拟训练的研究,使用经过验证的度量标准。
我们的荟萃分析发现,PBP 训练通过减少操作错误来提高受训者的表现。有足够的证据探索 PBP 训练在牙科技能培训中的应用。与标准训练相比,PBP 训练估计可将手术错误的平均发生率降低 62%。鉴于手术技能与患者结果之间存在直接相关性,这些数据表明,有足够的证据探索 PBP 训练在牙科技能培训中的应用。