Yatsuka Seikeigekanaika, Saitama 340-0028, Japan.
Graduate Course of Health and Social Services, Graduate School of Saitama Prefectural University, Saitama 343-8540, Japan; Research Fellowship for Young Scientists, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo 102-0083, Japan.
Gait Posture. 2022 Feb;92:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.043. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
The foot arch plays an important role in propulsion and shock absorption during walking and running; however, the relationship among the foot arch, metatarsal locking theory, and nature of the windlass mechanism (WM) remain unclear.
What are the differences in the kinematic relationship between the foot arch, hindfoot, and hallux during walking and running?
Relative angles within the foot were measured in 18 healthy men using the Oxford foot model (OFM). Data for barefoot walking at a comfortable speed and rearfoot running at 2.0 m/s were collected. Angles of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot (OFM-arch), hallux relative to the forefoot (Hallux) on the sagittal plane, and hindfoot relative to the shank (Hindfoot) on three anatomical planes were obtained. The medial longitudinal arch (MLA) angle was calculated to verify that OFM-arch can substitute the MLA angle. Each parameter was subjected to cross-correlation analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to examine the relationship with OFM-arch and compare them during walking and running.
OFM-arch was similar to the conventional MLA projection angle in both trials (gait: 0.79, running: 0.96 p < 0.01). Synchronization of the OFM-arch and Hallux angles was higher in running than in walking (gait: -0.09, running: -0.75 p < 0.01). Hindfoot supination was unrelated to OFM-arch. Hindfoot angle on the transverse plane exhibited a moderate relationship with OFM-arch, indicating different correlations in walking and running (gait: 0.63, running: -0.68 p < 0.01).
The elevation of the foot arch due to hallux dorsiflexion differed during walking and running; hence, other factors besides WM (such as intrinsic muscles) may affect the foot arch elevation during running. The hindfoot in the frontal plane does not contribute to arch raising and foot stability during running; it features different relationships with OFM-arch during walking and running.
足弓在行走和跑步时的推进和减震中起着重要作用;然而,足弓、跖骨锁定理论和卷扬机机制(WM)的本质之间的关系尚不清楚。
行走和跑步时,足弓、后足和大脚趾之间的运动学关系有何不同?
使用牛津足模型(OFM)测量 18 名健康男性的足部相对角度。采集了舒适速度下赤脚行走和 2.0 m/s 后足跑步的数据。获得了矢状面上足前相对后足(OFM-足弓)、大脚趾相对足前(大脚趾)和三个解剖平面上后足相对胫骨(后足)的角度。计算内侧纵弓(MLA)角度以验证 OFM-足弓可以替代 MLA 角度。对每个参数进行交叉相关分析和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,以检查与 OFM-足弓的关系,并比较行走和跑步时的关系。
OFM-足弓在两种试验中均与传统的 MLA 投影角度相似(步态:0.79,跑步:0.96 p<0.01)。OFM-足弓和大脚趾角度的同步性在跑步时高于行走时(步态:-0.09,跑步:-0.75 p<0.01)。后足旋前与 OFM-足弓无关。横断面上后足角度与 OFM-足弓呈中度相关,表明行走和跑步时的相关性不同(步态:0.63,跑步:-0.68 p<0.01)。
由于大脚趾背屈,足弓抬高在行走和跑步时有所不同;因此,除 WM(如内在肌肉)以外的其他因素可能会影响跑步时足弓的抬高。在跑步时,前平面上的后足不会影响足弓抬高和足部稳定性;它在行走和跑步时与 OFM-足弓具有不同的关系。