• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[中小学生分级急救培训方案:“宝安模式”社会应急医学培训体系构建的实践]

[Hierarchical first aid training scheme for elementary and middle school students: the practices from the construction of "Baoan Model" social emergency medicine training].

作者信息

Lin Jinle, Wang Conghua, Fang Yimei, Luo Yi, Xu Jun, Zhang Wenwu, Dou Qingli, Yu Xuezhong

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, People's Hospital of Shenzhen Baoan District, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, Guangdong, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China. Corresponding author: Dou Qingli, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Sep;33(9):1121-1125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210413-00551.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210413-00551
PMID:34839873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To share the implementation experience of hierarchical first aid training scheme for elementary and middle school students in Baoan District of Shenzhen City and evaluate its effect of training.

METHODS

During August 2018 and August 2019, elementary and middle schools students who participated in the first aid training held by emergency rescue training center of Baoan District were enrolled. Baseline information including the number of students, the number of attending tutors, the number of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training models, automated external defibrillator (AED) models were recorded. According to hierarchical levels of three age, students received different courses with content from simple to hard: the course of elementary school students was consisting of dialing 120, smart animation on how to identify accidental damage, demonstration of AED and Hemlick techniques, CPR practise (40 minutes). The course of junior high school students was consisted of how to dial 120, how to identify accidental damage and simple disposal, application of CPR and AED, practice CPR and AED and Hemlick techniques (90 minutes). The course of high school students was consisted of how to dial 120, identify accidental damage and right disposal, identification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the key-point of CPR and AED, practice CPR and AED, Hemlick techniques and hemostatic bandage (120 minutes). At the end of course, elementary school students were voluntary for skill assessment; junior high school students only were compulsory for skill assessment in small classes but not required in large classes, just for demonstration; additionally, the whole high school students were compulsory for skill assessment. The characteristics of first aid training students at different levels were collected in order to compare the differences on the usage of CPR training model and AED training model, the distribution of emergency resource, the ratio for passing examination.

RESULTS

A total of 12 896 students and 2 086 training instructors took parted in 200 lists of first aid training courses, 8 557 CPR models and 8 493 AED models were used. On average, there are 65.27±5.61 students in each session, and 10.52±10.43 training instructors. There are 43.09±19.06 CPR training models and 42.77±18.61 AED training models. The mean ratio of student to tutor was 6.07±1.47, student to CPR model was 1.54±1.02, and student to AED model was 1.54±1.03. In the end of course, 10 494 students participated in the examination with the participation rate of 81.37%; 10 114 students passed the examination with the passing rate of 96.38%. Hierarchical analysis showed: compare to elementary school students, the average number of junior high school students in every training session significantly increased (cases: 69.94±8.77 vs. 58.69±6.12, P < 0.05), but the average number of high school students in every training session significantly decreased (cases: 57.35±5.79 vs. 58.69±6.12, P < 0.05). The proportion of instructors in junior high school students' training significantly reduced (5.94±1.39 vs. 6.48±2.02, P < 0.05). The examination ratio of junior high school students and high school students was increased significantly [81.07% (6 667/8 224), 100% (2 313/2 313) vs. 64.18% (1 514/2 359), both P < 0.05], but the ratio of passing the examination was significantly reduced [95.47% (6 365/6 667), 96.88% (2 241/2 313) vs. 99.60%(1 508/1 514), both P < 0.01]. This might be related to the low difficulty of elementary school students' assessment and the low proportion of compulsory examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Hierarchical scheme is feasible for first aid training in elementary and middle school students, the content of course should be desighed from easy to hard. Synchronously, sufficient training instructors and training models should be equipped to ensure the quality.

摘要

目的

分享深圳市宝安区中小学生分层急救培训方案的实施经验并评价其培训效果。

方法

选取2018年8月至2019年8月参加宝安区应急救援培训中心举办的急救培训的中小学生。记录基线信息,包括学生人数、授课导师人数、心肺复苏(CPR)培训模型数量、自动体外除颤器(AED)模型数量。根据三个年龄段的分层,学生接受从简单到困难的不同课程:小学生课程包括拨打120、如何识别意外伤害的智能动画、AED和海姆立克手法演示、CPR练习(40分钟)。初中生课程包括如何拨打120、如何识别意外伤害及简单处理、CPR和AED的应用、CPR和AED及海姆立克手法练习(90分钟)。高中生课程包括如何拨打120、识别意外伤害及正确处理、院外心脏骤停的识别、CPR和AED的要点、CPR和AED练习、海姆立克手法及止血包扎(120分钟)。课程结束时,小学生自愿参加技能考核;初中生仅小班学生强制参加技能考核,大班不要求,仅作演示;此外,全体高中生强制参加技能考核。收集不同层次急救培训学生的特点,以比较CPR培训模型和AED培训模型的使用情况、应急资源分布、考试通过率的差异。

结果

共有12896名学生和2086名培训导师参加了200期急救培训课程,使用了8557个CPR模型和8493个AED模型。平均每次课程有65.27±5.61名学生,10.52±10.43名培训导师。有43.09±19.06个CPR培训模型和42.77±18.61个AED培训模型。学生与导师的平均比例为6.07±1.47,学生与CPR模型的比例为1.54±1.02,学生与AED模型的比例为1.54±1.03。课程结束时,10494名学生参加考试,参考率为81.37%;10114名学生通过考试,通过率为96.38%。分层分析显示:与小学生相比,初中生每次培训的平均人数显著增加(例数:69.94±8.77 vs. 58.69±6.12,P<0.05),但高中生每次培训的平均人数显著减少(例数:57.35±5.79 vs. 58.69±6.12,P<0.05)。初中生培训中导师的比例显著降低(5.94±1.39 vs. 6.48±2.02,P<0.05)。初中生和高中生的考试参考率显著提高[81.07%(6667/8224),100%(2313/2313)vs. 64.18%(1514/2359),均P<0.05],但考试通过率显著降低[95.47%(6365/6667),96.88%(2241/2313)vs. 99.60%(1508/1514),均P<0.01]。这可能与小学生考核难度低及强制考试比例低有关。

结论

分层方案对中小学生急救培训可行,课程内容应从易到难设计。同时,应配备足够的培训导师和培训模型以确保质量。

相似文献

1
[Hierarchical first aid training scheme for elementary and middle school students: the practices from the construction of "Baoan Model" social emergency medicine training].[中小学生分级急救培训方案:“宝安模式”社会应急医学培训体系构建的实践]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Sep;33(9):1121-1125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210413-00551.
2
Innovative cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator programs in schools: Results from the Student Program for Olympic Resuscitation Training in Schools (SPORTS) study.创新性心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器在学校中的应用项目:来自学校奥林匹克复苏培训学生项目(SPORTS)研究的结果。
Resuscitation. 2016 Jul;104:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Compression-only CPR training in elementary schools and student attitude toward CPR.小学阶段的单纯胸外按压心肺复苏培训及学生对心肺复苏的态度
Pediatr Int. 2016 Aug;58(8):698-704. doi: 10.1111/ped.12881. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Brief compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator course for secondary school students: a multischool feasibility study.对中学生进行简短的单纯按压心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器课程:一项多校可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):e040469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040469.
5
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automatic external defibrillator training in schools: "is anyone learning how to save a life?".学校中的心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器培训:“有人在学习如何拯救生命吗?”
CJEM. 2013 Sep;15(5):270-8. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130898.
6
Sex Disparities in Receipt of Bystander Interventions for Students Who Experienced Cardiac Arrest in Japan.日本遭遇心搏骤停学生旁观者干预措施获得情况的性别差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e195111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5111.
7
Learning Effectiveness Assessment between Primary School Students and Adults in Basic Life Support Education.小学生与成人在基础生命支持教育中的学习效果评估
Emerg Med Int. 2021 Feb 24;2021:5579402. doi: 10.1155/2021/5579402. eCollection 2021.
8
[CPR education in Japan--past, present and future].[日本的心肺复苏教育——过去、现在与未来]
Nihon Rinsho. 2011 Apr;69(4):658-69.
9
Comparison of three instructional methods for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of an automatic external defibrillator to high school students.三种向高中生教授心肺复苏术及自动体外除颤器使用方法的教学方法比较。
Resuscitation. 2006 Jun;69(3):443-53. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.08.020. Epub 2006 May 5.
10
How well are cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills retained over time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial.随着时间推移,心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器技能的掌握情况如何?公众可获取除颤(PAD)试验的结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):254-63. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.10.010. Epub 2006 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and willingness toward out-of-hospital CPR and AED: A questionnaire study among Chinese middle school students.中国中学生对院外心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器的态度及意愿:一项问卷调查研究
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 10;9(4):e15430. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15430. eCollection 2023 Apr.