Alam Gazi Mahabubul
Department of Foundation of Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Persiaran Masjid, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Technol Soc. 2021 Aug;66:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101677. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
Higher education (HE) serves to produce well trained and job-ready graduates. Despite this belief, whether HE produces certificates/qualifications or job-ready graduates-this debate remains unsettled. To date, the current COVID-19 pandemic which erupted in late 2019 continues to create much economic, social and political dislocation throughout the world. Consequently, one outcome for HE during this crisis is the much greater dependence on online/digital technology to deliver courses and programs. Although it is not considered to be a complete substitute, critics argue that education delivered through online technology has expended the 'diploma disease' crisis and subsequently may pose a threat to the viability of producing HE graduates. It has been suggested that this can result in significant long-term problems that may be impossible to recover from. This study was based on a 'empirical survey' where the sample incorporated 240 people in two groups (before and during COVID-19, for a total of 120 in each), and the objective was to examine academic and job-readiness of graduates in greater depth. Findings demonstrate that pre-pandemic students scored poorly academically compared to their post-pandemic classmates. Pre-pandemic graduates, on the other hand, had higher work readiness scores in terms of both aptitude and practical aspects. Furthermore, both groups outperformed their job-readiness scores in terms of learning performance. This raises the question: is it the job of higher education to promote sustainable production of graduates or deliver certificates and degrees? COVID-19 appears to have been utilised by the HE system as an excuse to exacerbate the "diploma disease crisis," a scenario that must be resolved by developing a proper policy framework that allows HE to play the necessary role in an emergency. Meaningful measures should be taken so that online technology is employed properly in this situation.
高等教育旨在培养训练有素、具备就业能力的毕业生。尽管有这种信念,但高等教育是培养证书/资格还是培养具备就业能力的毕业生——这场辩论仍未解决。迄今为止,2019年末爆发的新冠疫情仍在全球造成诸多经济、社会和政治混乱。因此,高等教育在这场危机中的一个结果是对在线/数字技术来提供课程和项目的更大依赖。尽管它不被视为一种完全的替代方式,但批评者认为,通过在线技术提供的教育加剧了“文凭病”危机,随后可能对培养高等教育毕业生的可行性构成威胁。有人认为,这可能导致重大的长期问题,可能无法恢复。本研究基于一项“实证调查”,样本包括两组共240人(新冠疫情之前和期间各120人),目的是更深入地研究毕业生的学业和就业准备情况。研究结果表明,疫情前的学生在学业上的得分低于疫情后的同学。另一方面,疫情前的毕业生在能力和实践方面的就业准备得分更高。此外,两组在学习表现方面的就业准备得分都更高。这就提出了一个问题:高等教育的职责是促进毕业生的可持续培养还是颁发证书和学位?新冠疫情似乎被高等教育系统用作加剧“文凭病危机”的借口,这种情况必须通过制定适当的政策框架来解决,该框架应允许高等教育在紧急情况下发挥必要作用。应该采取有意义的措施,以便在这种情况下正确使用在线技术。