• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于参与癌症临床试验患者的基于平板电脑的决策辅助工具的开发与初步评估

Development and preliminary evaluation of tablet computer-based decision aid for patients participating in cancer clinical trials.

作者信息

Okada Hiroko, Okuhara Tsuyoshi, Kiuchi Takahiro

机构信息

Department of Health Communication, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Nov 11;24:100854. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100854. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100854
PMID:34841121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606332/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients often consent to participate in cancer clinical trials despite misunderstanding the trial content. We developed a tablet-based clinical trial decision aid and tested its use with the usual discussion at the time of clinical trial registration.

METHODS

Participants were individuals considering participating in a breast cancer clinical trial. The control participated in usual discussions; the intervention group participated in discussion using the decision aid. Pre- and post-discussion, we investigated knowledge, decision-making conflict, and discussion length.

RESULTS

We enrolled 54 patients, 27 in the control group and 27 in the intervention group. Post-discussion clinical trial knowledge was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.003). No significant difference was found in decisional conflict, but the intervention group tended to have lower post-discussion conflict than the control group. There was no between-group difference in the length of discussions with physicians and clinical research coordinators.

CONCLUSION

For women considering participation in cancer clinical trials, a tablet-based decision aid may promote clinical trial understanding without increasing discussion length or patient burden. This pre-learning decision aid incorporating a quiz and bidirectional question prompt lists may improve participants' understanding of clinical trials.

摘要

目的

尽管患者对试验内容存在误解,但他们仍经常同意参与癌症临床试验。我们开发了一种基于平板电脑的临床试验决策辅助工具,并在临床试验登记时将其与常规讨论一起使用进行了测试。

方法

参与者为考虑参与乳腺癌临床试验的个体。对照组参与常规讨论;干预组使用决策辅助工具参与讨论。在讨论前后,我们调查了知识、决策冲突和讨论时长。

结果

我们招募了54名患者,对照组27名,干预组27名。讨论后,干预组的临床试验知识显著高于对照组(p = 0.003)。在决策冲突方面未发现显著差异,但干预组讨论后的冲突往往低于对照组。与医生和临床研究协调员的讨论时长在组间没有差异。

结论

对于考虑参与癌症临床试验的女性,基于平板电脑的决策辅助工具可能会促进对临床试验的理解,而不会增加讨论时长或患者负担。这种包含测验和双向问题提示列表的预学习决策辅助工具可能会提高参与者对临床试验的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e3/8606332/f7e410165e6b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e3/8606332/f7e410165e6b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e3/8606332/f7e410165e6b/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary evaluation of tablet computer-based decision aid for patients participating in cancer clinical trials.用于参与癌症临床试验患者的基于平板电脑的决策辅助工具的开发与初步评估
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Nov 11;24:100854. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100854. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.为考虑参与临床试验的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD009736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.
3
Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.随机对照试验研究在线决策辅助工具对年轻女性癌症患者生育力保存的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1726-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez136.
4
Eggsurance? A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for elective egg freezing.“卵子保险”?一项关于选择性卵子冷冻决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Aug 1;39(8):1724-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae121.
5
6
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
7
The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial.决策辅助干预对冠心病风险降低决策的影响:一项随机试验的二次分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Feb 28;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-14.
8
Randomized control trial of a decision aid for women considering elective egg freezing: The Eggsurance study protocol.随机对照试验一项决策辅助工具对考虑选择性卵子冷冻的女性:Eggsurance 研究方案。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221139673. doi: 10.1177/17455057221139673.
9
10
Facilitating decision-making in women undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: BRECONDA randomized controlled trial results.促进遗传性乳腺癌基因检测女性的决策制定:BRECONDA 随机对照试验结果。
Breast. 2017 Dec;36:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
e-Consent in UK academic-led clinical trials: current practice, challenges and the need for more evidence.英国学术主导的临床试验中的电子知情同意书:当前的实践、挑战和对更多证据的需求。
Trials. 2023 Oct 10;24(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07656-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
2
Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.为考虑参与临床试验的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD009736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.
3
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.证据何在?共享决策制定与患者预后的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.迈向患者决策辅助工具认证的最低标准:一种改进的德尔菲共识过程。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
5
Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force.电子系统采集患者报告结局(PRO)数据的验证——临床试验团队的建议:ISPOR ePRO 系统验证良好研究实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.002.
6
Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale to investigate the value of pharmacists' information: a before and after study.用于调查药剂师信息价值的日语版决策冲突量表的开发与验证:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 17;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-50.
7
Testing the utility of a cancer clinical trial specific Question Prompt List (QPL-CT) during oncology consultations.在肿瘤学咨询中测试癌症临床试验专用问题提示清单 (QPL-CT) 的效用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 4.
8
The relationships among knowledge, self-efficacy, preparedness, decisional conflict, and decisions to participate in a cancer clinical trial.知识、自我效能、准备度、决策冲突与参与癌症临床试验决策之间的关系。
Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):481-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3043. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
9
Patients' perception of the usefulness of a question prompt sheet for advanced cancer patients when deciding the initial treatment: a randomized, controlled trial.患者对用于晚期癌症患者初始治疗决策的问题提示表的有用性的感知:一项随机对照试验。
Psychooncology. 2012 Jul;21(7):706-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.1955. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
10
Knowledge and understanding among cancer patients consenting to participate in clinical trials.同意参与临床试验的癌症患者的知识和理解。
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Nov;44(17):2627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Sep 23.