Suppr超能文献

相关性状的线性链接(LLRT):一种用于协调无共同项目或仅有少量共同项目的认知领域的新方法。

Linear linking for related traits (LLRT): A novel method for the harmonization of cognitive domains with no or few common items.

作者信息

Nichols Emma L, Cadar Dorina, Lee Jinkook, Jones Richard N, Gross Alden L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, W6508, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Institute of Epidemiology & Health, University College London, Grower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England.

出版信息

Methods. 2022 Aug;204:179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

Harmonization means to make data comparable. Recent efforts to generate comparable data on cognitive performance of older adults from many different countries around the world have presented challenges for direct comparison. Neuropsychological instruments vary in many respects, including language, administration techniques and cultural differences, which all present important obstacles to assumptions regarding the presence of linking items. Item response theory (IRT) methods have been previously used to harmonize cross-national data on cognition, but these methods rely on linking items to establish the shared metric. We introduce an alternative approach for linking cognitive performance across two (or more) groups when the fielded assessments contain no items that can be reasonably considered linking items: Linear Linking for Related Traits (LLRT). We demonstrate this methodological approach in a sample from a single United States study split by educational attainment, and in two sets of cross-national comparisons (United States to England, and United States to India). All data were collected as part of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) and are publicly available. Our method relies upon strong assumptions, and we offer suggestions for how the method can be extended to relax those assumptions in future work.

摘要

协调意味着使数据具有可比性。最近,为了生成来自世界上许多不同国家的老年人认知表现的可比数据所做的努力,给直接比较带来了挑战。神经心理学测试工具在许多方面存在差异,包括语言、施测技术和文化差异,这些都对关于是否存在链接项目的假设构成了重要障碍。项目反应理论(IRT)方法此前已被用于协调跨国认知数据,但这些方法依赖于链接项目来建立共享度量。当实地评估中没有可以合理视为链接项目的项目时,我们引入了一种用于在两组(或更多组)之间链接认知表现的替代方法:相关特质的线性链接(LLRT)。我们在美国一项按教育程度划分的单一研究样本中,以及在两组跨国比较(美国与英国,以及美国与印度)中展示了这种方法。所有数据都是作为统一认知评估协议(HCAP)的一部分收集的,并且是公开可用的。我们的方法依赖于强有力的假设,并且我们为如何在未来的工作中扩展该方法以放宽这些假设提供了建议。

相似文献

2
Harmonization of cognitive screening tools for dementia across diverse samples: A simulation study.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Jun 18;15(2):e12438. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12438. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Cross-national harmonization of cognitive measures across HRS HCAP (USA) and LASI-DAD (India).
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264166. eCollection 2022.
5
The Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Project: Study Design and Methods.
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(1):64-74. doi: 10.1159/000503004. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
8
Memory and language cognitive data harmonization across the United States and Mexico.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023 Sep 13;15(3):e12478. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12478. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a refined harmonization approach for longitudinal cognitive data in people with HIV.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;178:111620. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111620. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Factor structure of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol neuropsychological battery in the Health and Retirement Study.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Jan;30(1):47-55. doi: 10.1017/S135561772300019X. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

3
Design and Methodology of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (LASI-DAD).
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5-S10. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16737.
4
Measurement and Structure of Cognition in the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S11-S19. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16738.
5
The Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Project: Study Design and Methods.
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(1):64-74. doi: 10.1159/000503004. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
Genetic data and cognitively defined late-onset Alzheimer's disease subgroups.
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;25(11):2942-2951. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0298-8. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Incidence of cognitively defined late-onset Alzheimer's dementia subgroups from a prospective cohort study.
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Dec;13(12):1307-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables: A Comparison of Three Approaches.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Jul 1;36(3):347-87. doi: 10.1207/S15327906347-387.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验