Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Feb 1;45(2):381-390. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1667.
To assess the efficacy and safety of closed-loop insulin delivery compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy among older adults with type 1 diabetes.
This open-label, randomized (1:1), crossover trial compared 4 months of closed-loop versus sensor-augmented pump therapy. Eligible adults were aged ≥60 years, with type 1 diabetes (duration ≥10 years), using an insulin pump. The primary outcome was continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) time in range (TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L).
There were 30 participants (mean age 67 [SD 5] years), with median type 1 diabetes duration of 38 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20-47), randomized (n = 15 to each sequence); all completed the trial. The mean TIR was 75.2% (SD 6.3) during the closed-loop stage and 69.0% (9.1) during the sensor-augmented pump stage (difference of 6.2 percentage points [95% CI 4.4 to 8.0]; P < 0.0001). All prespecified CGM metrics favored closed loop over the sensor-augmented pump; benefits were greatest overnight. Closed loop reduced CGM time <3.9 mmol/L during 24 h/day by 0.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.3 to 1.1; P = 0.0005) and overnight by 0.8 percentage points (0.4 to 1.1; P < 0.0001) compared with sensor-augmented pump. There was no significant difference in HbA1c between closed-loop versus sensor-augmented pump stages (7.3% [IQR, 7.1-7.5] (56 mmol/mol [54-59]) vs. 7.5% [7.1-7.9] (59 mmol/mol [54-62]), respectively; P = 0.13). Three severe hypoglycemia events occurred during the closed-loop stage and two occurred during the sensor-augmented pump stage; no hypoglycemic events required hospitalization. One episode of diabetic ketoacidosis occurred during the sensor-augmented pump stage; no serious adverse events occurred during the closed-loop stage.
Closed-loop therapy is an effective treatment option for older adults with long-duration type 1 diabetes, and no safety issues were identified. These older adults had higher TIR accompanied by less time below range during closed loop than during sensor-augmented pump therapy. Of particular clinical importance, closed loop reduced the time spent in hypoglycemic range overnight.
评估闭环胰岛素输注与传感器增强型泵治疗在老年 1 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项开放标签、随机(1:1)交叉试验,比较了 4 个月的闭环与传感器增强型泵治疗。符合条件的成年人年龄≥60 岁,患有 1 型糖尿病(病程≥10 年),使用胰岛素泵。主要结局是连续血糖监测(CGM)时间在目标范围内(TIR;3.9-10.0mmol/L)。
共有 30 名参与者(平均年龄 67 [SD 5] 岁),中位 1 型糖尿病病程为 38 年(四分位距 [IQR] 20-47),随机分为(n = 15)每组;所有参与者均完成了试验。闭环阶段 TIR 为 75.2%(SD 6.3),传感器增强型泵阶段为 69.0%(9.1)(差值为 6.2 个百分点 [95%CI 4.4 至 8.0];P<0.0001)。所有预设的 CGM 指标均支持闭环优于传感器增强型泵;益处最大的是夜间。与传感器增强型泵相比,闭环治疗可使 24 小时内 CGM 时间<3.9mmol/L 降低 0.5 个百分点(95%CI 0.3 至 1.1;P=0.0005),夜间降低 0.8 个百分点(0.4 至 1.1;P<0.0001)。闭环与传感器增强型泵阶段之间的 HbA1c 无显著差异(分别为 7.3%[IQR,7.1-7.5](56mmol/mol[54-59])和 7.5%[7.1-7.9](59mmol/mol[54-62]);P=0.13)。闭环阶段发生 3 次严重低血糖事件,传感器增强型泵阶段发生 2 次;无低血糖事件需要住院治疗。传感器增强型泵阶段发生 1 例糖尿病酮症酸中毒;闭环阶段未发生严重不良事件。
闭环治疗是老年长病程 1 型糖尿病患者的有效治疗选择,未发现安全性问题。这些老年患者在闭环治疗时的 TIR 更高,同时 CGM 时间在目标范围内的时间更长,而在传感器增强型泵治疗时的时间更短。特别重要的是,闭环治疗可减少夜间低血糖时间。