• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索单一评分量表在跨专业教育中的验证对教育的影响。

Exploring the Educational Impact of Using a Single-Point Rubric Through Validation in Interprofessional Education.

机构信息

Dep. of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Health Sciences, 2-64 Corbett Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada. Tel 780-492-4333.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 2021 Winter;50(4):253-262.

PMID:34845481
Abstract

There have been few studies regarding the impact on inter¬professional education (IPE) assessments and instruments to support learning and teaching. In this study, a single-point rubric was developed and evaluated to explore its educational impact on supporting learning and teaching. The research question was: To what degree does the single-point rubric support student learning and assist facilitators in developing feedback within the context of IPE? We tested the single-point rubric in the assessments within both interprofessional (IP) foundational and elective courses. One hundred eighty-seven rubrics across two IP courses were completed and collected. Of the 49 students and 17 facilitators who responded to the surveys, 3 students and 5 facilitators completed follow-up interviews. Two of the foundational course developers also participated in interviews. Kane's validity framework guided the validation process. Results showed that facilitators used the single-point rubric to provide structured and potentially helpful feedback. Students agreed with the feedback and could efficiently identify the strengths and weaknesses of their performance from the feedback. Students could use the suggestions from facilitators and their own engagement with the feedback to improve future IP learning. However, some facilitators did not provide students with suggestions for improvement, perhaps because they felt that they were not experienced enough to provide suggestions. Additional training is essential for facilitators to learn how to provide suggestions for improvement. The overall educational impact of the single-point rubric is positive, but future investigation with a larger sample size is required.

摘要

关于对跨专业教育(IPE)评估和支持学习和教学的工具的影响,研究甚少。在这项研究中,开发并评估了一种单点量表,以探索其对支持学习和教学的教育影响。研究问题是:单点量表在多大程度上支持学生学习,并帮助促进者在 IPE 背景下发展反馈?我们在跨专业基础和选修课程的评估中测试了单点量表。在两门跨专业课程中完成并收集了 187 个量表。在回应调查的 49 名学生和 17 名促进者中,有 3 名学生和 5 名促进者完成了后续访谈。两位基础课程的开发者也参加了访谈。凯恩的有效性框架指导了验证过程。结果表明,促进者使用单点量表提供结构化和潜在有益的反馈。学生对反馈表示赞同,并且能够从反馈中快速识别出自己表现的优势和劣势。学生可以利用促进者的建议和他们自己对反馈的参与来提高未来的跨专业学习。然而,一些促进者并未向学生提供改进建议,也许是因为他们觉得自己没有足够的经验提供建议。促进者需要接受额外的培训,以学习如何提供改进建议。单点量表的整体教育影响是积极的,但需要进一步研究更大的样本量。

相似文献

1
Exploring the Educational Impact of Using a Single-Point Rubric Through Validation in Interprofessional Education.探索单一评分量表在跨专业教育中的验证对教育的影响。
J Allied Health. 2021 Winter;50(4):253-262.
2
Outcomes of Introducing Early Learners to Interprofessional Competencies in a Classroom Setting.在课堂环境中向早期学习者引入跨专业能力的成果。
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):433-443. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1296361. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Interprofessional team-based learning (TBL): how do students engage?跨专业团队学习(TBL):学生如何参与?
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02024-5.
4
Translation of an evidence-based virtual reality simulation-based interprofessional education into health education curriculums: An implementation science method.基于循证虚拟现实模拟的跨专业教育向健康教育课程的转化:实施科学方法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Mar;110:105262. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105262. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Design and evaluation of an interprofessional education workshop series for preclinical and prelicensure health professional students.设计和评估一门面向临床前和许可前卫生专业学生的跨专业教育系列工作坊。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Jul;13(7):885-894. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.03.023. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
6
Assessment of student pharmacist learning within an interprofessional simulation: A comparison of small group vs. large group debriefing.跨专业模拟中对学生药剂师学习情况的评估:小组汇报与大组汇报的比较
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 May;11(5):533-537. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
The Graph Rubric: Development of a Teaching, Learning, and Research Tool.图表评分表:教学、学习和研究工具的开发。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):ar65. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-01-0007.
8
"Refreshed…reinforced…reflective": A qualitative exploration of interprofessional education facilitators' own interprofessional learning and collaborative practice.“焕然一新……得到强化……进行反思”:对跨专业教育促进者自身跨专业学习与协作实践的质性探索
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):702-709. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1223025.
9
Taking a closer look at undergraduate acute care interprofessional simulations: lessons learnt.深入探究本科急性护理跨专业模拟:经验教训
J Interprof Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):772-783. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1676705. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Interprofessional educational experience to assist in student readiness toward neurorehabilitation.跨专业教育体验,以帮助学生为神经康复做好准备。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2015 Apr;29(2):153-64. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1012775. Epub 2015 Mar 30.