Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedali Privati Forlì "Villa Igea", Forlì, Italy.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;50(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14026. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of intraocular lens power (IOL) formulas for cataract surgery after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).
This retrospective study included eyes which had previously undergone DALK and underwent standard phacoemulsification with monofocal IOL implantation between January 2012 and January 2021 at Ospedali Privati Forlì "Villa Igea" (Forlì, Italy). The predicted spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated using the Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hoffer Q, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Holladay II, Kane and SRK/T formulas. Prediction error (PE) was calculated as the actual postoperative SE refraction minus the SE predicted refraction.
Eighty-two eyes of 82 patients were included. The mean PE was negative using all formulas. Friedman test revealed a statistically significant difference of the median absolute PE (MedAE) among the different IOL formulas (P = 0.005). On the basis of the MedAE, the formulas were ranked as follows: SRK/T (0.805 D), Kane (0.810 D), EVO (0.845 D), Hoffer QST (0.847 D), Barrett (0.895 D), Holladay 1 (0.915 D), Haigis (1.010 D) and Hoffer Q (1.070 D) formulas.
All formulas had a tendency towards a myopic refractive shift in post-DALK eyes. Although the SRK/T, Kane, EVO and Hoffer QST formulas were more accurate, predictability of refractive outcomes was lower than in virgin eyes.
本研究旨在评估在深板层角膜移植术(DALK)后白内障手术中人工晶状体(IOL)计算公式的准确性。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在意大利费利(Forlì)的 Ospedali Privati Forlì“Villa Igea”医院接受过 DALK 并接受标准超声乳化白内障吸除术联合单焦点 IOL 植入的患者。采用 Barrett Universal II、Emmetropia Verifying Optical(EVO)、Haigis、Hoffer Q、Hoffer QST、Holladay 1、Holladay II、Kane 和 SRK/T 公式计算预测球镜等效(SE)。预测误差(PE)定义为实际术后 SE 折射与预测 SE 折射之差。
纳入 82 例 82 只眼。所有公式的平均 PE 均为负值。Friedman 检验显示不同 IOL 公式的中位数绝对 PE(MedAE)存在统计学差异(P=0.005)。根据 MedAE,公式的排名如下:SRK/T(0.805 D)、Kane(0.810 D)、EVO(0.845 D)、Hoffer QST(0.847 D)、Barrett(0.895 D)、Holladay 1(0.915 D)、Haigis(1.010 D)和 Hoffer Q(1.070 D)公式。
所有公式在 DALK 术后眼均存在近视性屈光漂移趋势。尽管 SRK/T、Kane、EVO 和 Hoffer QST 公式更准确,但屈光结果的可预测性低于正常眼。