Suppr超能文献

55 岁以下初次膝关节置换患者的全因生存率和功能结局如何?一项系统评价。

What Are the All-Cause Survivorship Rates and Functional Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Undergoing Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):507-522. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately one-fourth of TKAs will be performed in patients 55 years or younger within the next decade. Postoperative outcomes for younger patients who had a knee arthroplasty were systematically reviewed in 2011; however, numerous studies evaluating young patients who had both a TKA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have been reported in the past decade. Therefore, to better counsel this growing population of young patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, an updated understanding of their expected postoperative outcomes is warranted.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we evaluated (1) all-cause survivorship, (2) reasons for revision, (3) patient-reported outcomes, and (4) return to physical activity and sport in patients 55 years or younger undergoing primary TKA or UKA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, SportDiscus, and CINAHL was performed to identify all original studies evaluating outcomes after primary knee arthroplasty for young patients (55 years of age or younger) from inception until March 2021. The following keywords were used: knee, arthroplasty, replacement, pain, function, revision, survivorship, sport, physical activity, and return to play. Only original research studies that were related to knee arthroplasty and reported postoperative outcomes with a minimum 1-year follow-up for patients 55 years or younger were included. Unpublished materials, publications not available in English, and studies with a primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score was used to evaluate the study quality of case series and comparative studies, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Jadad scale were used for randomized studies. The primary outcomes of interest for this study were all-cause survivorship rate, reasons for all-cause revision, Knee Society and Knee Society Function scores (minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 7.2 and 9.7, respectively), WOMAC scores (MCID 10), Tegner scores (no reported MCID for knee arthroplasty), and return to physical activity or sport. Knee Society and Knee Society Function scores range from 0 to 100, with scores from 85 to 100 considered excellent and below 60 representing poor outcomes. All-cause survivorship rate and reasons for revision were both reported in 17 total studies. Knee Society scores were presented in 19 and Knee Society Function scores were reported in 18 included studies. WOMAC scores and Tegner scores were each found in four included studies, and return to physical activity and return to sport analyses were performed in seven studies. Overall, 21 TKA studies and five UKA studies were included in this analysis, featuring 3095 TKA knees and 482 UKA knees.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause survivorship ranged from 90% to 98% at 5 to 10 years of follow-up after TKA and from 84% to 99% (95% CI 93% to 98%) at 10 years to 20 years post-TKA. All-cause UKA survivorship was 90% at 10 years and 75% at 19 years in the largest Kaplan-Meier estimate of survivorship for patients younger than 55 who underwent UKA. Common reasons for revision in TKA patients were polyethylene wear/loosening, aseptic tibial loosening, and infection, and in UKA patients the common reasons for revision were knee pain, aseptic loosening, progression of knee osteoarthritis, and polyethylene wear/loosening. Knee Society scores ranged from 85 to 98 for 5-year to 10-year follow-up and ranged from 86 to 97 at 10-year to 20-year follow-up in TKA patients. Knee Society Function scores ranged from 70 to 95 for 5-year to 10-year follow-up and ranged from 79 to 86 at 10-year to 20-year follow-up. Return to physical activity and sport was reported variably; however, most patients younger than 55 have improved physical activity levels after knee arthroplasty relative to preoperative levels.

CONCLUSION

Although all-cause survivorship rates were frequently above 90% and patient-reported outcome scores were generally in the good to excellent range, several studies reported long-term survivorship rates from 70% to 85% and fair patient-reported outcome scores, which must be factored into any preoperative counseling with patients. We could not control for surgeon volume in this report, and prior research suggests that increasing volume is associated with less frequent complications; in addition, the studies we included were variably affected by selection bias, transfer bias, and assessment bias, which makes it likely that the findings of our review represent best-case estimates. To limit the frequency of revision in patients younger than 55 years undergoing TKA, clinicians should be cautious of polyethylene wear/loosening, aseptic tibial loosening, and infection, while knee pain and progression of knee osteoarthritis are also common reasons for revision in patients younger than 55 undergoing UKA. Further research should isolate younger knee arthroplasty patients and evaluate postoperative activity levels while accounting for preoperative physical activity and sport participation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

在未来十年内,大约四分之一的全膝关节置换术 (TKA) 将在 55 岁以下的患者中进行。2011 年系统地回顾了年轻患者膝关节置换术后的结果;然而,在过去十年中,有许多研究评估了同时接受 TKA 和单髁膝关节置换术 (UKA) 的年轻患者。因此,为了更好地为接受膝关节置换术的这一不断增长的年轻患者群体提供咨询,有必要了解他们术后结果的最新情况。

问题/目的:在这项系统评价中,我们评估了 (1) 所有原因的生存率,(2) 翻修原因,(3) 患者报告的结果,以及 (4) 55 岁以下接受初次 TKA 或 UKA 的患者重返身体活动和运动的情况。

方法

通过综合检索 PubMed、Medline、SportDiscus 和 CINAHL,以确定从开始到 2021 年 3 月所有与 55 岁以下年轻患者初次膝关节置换术后结果相关的原始研究。使用了以下关键词:膝盖、关节置换术、置换、疼痛、功能、翻修、生存率、运动、身体活动和重返运动。仅纳入与膝关节置换术相关并报告了术后至少 1 年随访的患者年龄在 55 岁以下的研究。排除未发表的材料、未以英文发表的出版物以及主要诊断为类风湿关节炎的研究。使用非随机研究的方法学指数 (MINORS) 评分来评估病例系列和对照研究的研究质量,而随机研究则使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和 Jadad 量表。本研究的主要结果是所有原因的生存率、所有原因翻修的原因、膝关节协会和膝关节协会功能评分 (分别为 7.2 和 9.7 的最小临床重要差异 [MCID])、WOMAC 评分 (MCID 为 10)、Tegner 评分(没有报道膝关节置换术的 MCID)以及身体活动或运动的恢复。膝关节协会和膝关节协会功能评分范围从 0 到 100,85 到 100 分代表优秀,60 分以下代表较差的结果。17 项总研究报告了所有原因的生存率和翻修原因。19 项研究报告了膝关节协会评分,18 项研究报告了膝关节协会功能评分。四项研究中各有 WOMAC 评分和 Tegner 评分,七项研究进行了身体活动和重返运动的分析。总体而言,这项分析纳入了 21 项 TKA 研究和 5 项 UKA 研究,共纳入了 3095 例 TKA 膝关节和 482 例 UKA 膝关节。

结果

TKA 后 5 年至 10 年的 Kaplan-Meier 估计生存率为 90%至 98%,TKA 后 10 年至 20 年的生存率为 84%至 99%(95%CI 93%至 98%)。在对年龄小于 55 岁接受 UKA 的患者生存率的最大 Kaplan-Meier 估计中,UKA 的 10 年生存率为 90%,19 年生存率为 75%。TKA 患者翻修的常见原因是聚乙烯磨损/松动、胫骨无菌性松动和感染,而 UKA 患者翻修的常见原因是膝关节疼痛、无菌性松动、膝关节骨关节炎进展和聚乙烯磨损/松动。TKA 患者的膝关节协会评分在 5 年至 10 年随访时为 85 至 98 分,在 10 年至 20 年随访时为 86 至 97 分。TKA 患者的膝关节协会功能评分在 5 年至 10 年随访时为 70 至 95 分,在 10 年至 20 年随访时为 79 至 86 分。重返身体活动和运动的情况报告各不相同;然而,大多数 55 岁以下的患者在膝关节置换术后的身体活动水平相对于术前有所提高。

结论

尽管所有原因的生存率经常高于 90%,患者报告的结果评分通常处于良好至优秀范围,但几项研究报告了 70%至 85%的长期生存率和一般的患者报告结果评分,这必须在与患者进行术前咨询时考虑进去。在本报告中,我们无法控制外科医生的手术量,而先前的研究表明,手术量的增加与并发症的发生频率降低有关;此外,我们纳入的研究受到选择偏倚、转移偏倚和评估偏倚的不同程度的影响,这使得我们的综述结果可能是最佳估计值。为了减少 55 岁以下接受 TKA 的患者翻修的频率,临床医生应谨慎对待聚乙烯磨损/松动、胫骨无菌性松动和感染,而膝关节疼痛和膝关节骨关节炎的进展也是 55 岁以下接受 UKA 的患者翻修的常见原因。进一步的研究应将年轻的膝关节置换患者分离出来,并在考虑术前身体活动和运动参与的情况下评估术后活动水平。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验