• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接置入手臂下假体乳房重建:患者报告的结果。

Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes.

机构信息

From McGill University; and the Jewish General Hospital.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):882e-890e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008506.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008506
PMID:34847107
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity because of its lower levels of postoperative pain and animation deformity. BREAST-Q, a well-validated patient-reported outcomes tool, was used to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life. The goal of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes at 6-month and 1-year follow-up after direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixty-nine consented adult patients undergoing a total of 110 direct-to-implant, prepectoral, postmastectomy breast reconstructions completed BREAST-Q questionnaires immediately preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Mean breast satisfaction decreased nonsignificantly from 61.3 preoperatively to 58.6 at 12 months after reconstruction (p = 0.32). Psychosocial well-being improved nonsignificantly from 67.1 preoperatively to 71.1 at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.26). Physical well-being of the chest was insignificantly different, from 74.4 to 73.3 at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.62). Finally, sexual well-being similarly remained nonsignificantly changed from 60.2 preoperatively, to 59.1 at 12 months (p = 0.80). The use of acellular dermal matrix and postmastectomy radiotherapy did not have any significant effects on patient-reported outcomes. Through regression analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increased age, and incidence of rippling were found to negatively influence BREAST-Q results.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction demonstrated an overall satisfaction with their outcomes. As prepectoral breast reconstruction continues to advance and grow in popularity, patient-reported outcomes such as those presented in this study become of paramount importance in practice.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

摘要

背景

直接置管胸肌前置乳房重建术由于术后疼痛程度较低和运动畸形程度较低,最近再次流行。BREAST-Q 是一种经过充分验证的患者报告结局工具,用于评估患者满意度和生活质量。本研究的目的是评估直接置管胸肌前置乳房重建术后 6 个月和 1 年的患者报告结局。

方法

69 名同意的成年患者共接受了 110 例直接置管、胸肌前置、乳房切除术的乳房重建术,在术前、术后 6 个月和 12 个月时完成了 BREAST-Q 问卷。

结果

乳房满意度从术前的 61.3 分显著下降至重建后 12 个月的 58.6 分(p = 0.32)。术前心理社会健康从 67.1 分显著改善至 12 个月随访时的 71.1 分(p = 0.26)。12 个月随访时,胸部生理健康无显著差异,从 74.4 分降至 73.3 分(p = 0.62)。最后,术前性健康从 60.2 分同样保持不变,12 个月时为 59.1 分(p = 0.80)。脱细胞真皮基质和乳房切除术放疗的使用对患者报告结局没有任何显著影响。通过回归分析,新辅助化疗、年龄增加和波纹发生率被发现对 BREAST-Q 结果产生负面影响。

结论

接受直接置管胸肌前置乳房重建术的患者对其结果总体满意。随着胸肌前置乳房重建术的不断发展和普及,患者报告结局变得至关重要。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗,IV。

相似文献

1
Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes.直接置入手臂下假体乳房重建:患者报告的结果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):882e-890e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008506.
2
Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.胸前区修复性乳房重建治疗假体相关动态畸形:102例重建病例回顾
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Apr 6;38(5):519-526. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx261.
3
A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.胸大肌下和胸肌前 Strattice 基底即刻乳房重建的短期结果的前瞻性比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 May;141(5):1077-1084. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004270.
4
A Comparison of BREAST-Q Scores between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.假体置于胸大肌前与胸大肌下即刻乳房重建术后 BREAST-Q 评分比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Nov 1;148(5):708e-714e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008410.
5
An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.经算法改良的胸肌前置直接乳房重建术:第 2.0 版。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):1311-1319. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005519.
6
Quantifying the Impact of Prepectoral Implant Conversion on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life.定量评估胸肌前假体转换对患者满意度和生活质量的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 1;153(5):884e-894e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010829. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
Technical Refinements and Outcomes Assessment in Prepectoral Pocket Conversion After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.胸大肌前间隙口袋改建术后放疗的技术改进与效果评估。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 May 15;44(6):624-632. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae012.
8
Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.直接置管入胸假体乳房重建:单外科医生 201 例连续患者的经验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;145(4):686e-696e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006654.
9
Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.胸肌前置直接乳房重建:安全性结局指标和危险因素的界定。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):898e-908e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006721.
10
Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement.“一日乳房”即刻假体乳房重建手术技术的演变:从双平面到胸肌前置假体放置的转变。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jun;143(6):1547-1556. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005627.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing aesthetic outcomes of different incision types for nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by radiation therapy in prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a retrospective study.评估保留乳头的乳房切除术不同切口类型在胸前区直接植入式乳房重建并接受放射治疗后的美学效果:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 15;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03730-4.
2
Monitoring and Management of Infection following Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Retrospective Analysis of Conservative Treatment Versus Implant Removal.胸前植入式乳房重建术后感染的监测与管理:保守治疗与取出植入物的回顾性分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 5;13(2):e6516. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006516. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Management of Breast Cancer by Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction by Prepectoral Implant Approach with Polypropylene Mesh for Patients with Large Breasts.采用缩皮乳房切除术及经胸前植入聚丙烯网片即刻乳房重建术治疗巨乳症患者的乳腺癌管理
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr;49(7):1927-1937. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04529-6. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Impact of the Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment Score on Expander-Based Reconstruction Success.胸前区乳房重建评估评分对基于扩张器的重建成功率的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 28;13(21):6466. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216466.
5
Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Prior Breast Augmentation: Searching for the Optimal Reconstructive Option.乳房重建术在既往隆乳患者中的应用:探寻最佳的重建选择。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 10;60(10):1663. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101663.
6
Trends and Early Complications in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Database.直接植入式乳房重建的趋势与早期并发症:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的最新分析
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Aug;32(3):423-431. doi: 10.1177/22925503221141708. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
7
Three and twelve-month analysis of the PROM-Q study: comparison of patient-reported outcome measures using the BREAST-Q questionnaire in pre- vs. sub-pectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.PROM-Q 研究的 3 个月和 12 个月分析:使用 BREAST-Q 问卷在假体置入即刻乳房重建的胸肌前 vs. 胸肌下比较患者报告的结局测量指标。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):275-282. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07416-5. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
8
National trends in revision procedures in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: Autologous vs implant-based approaches.乳房再造术后翻修手术的国家趋势:自体与假体方法。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Aug;95:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
9
Narrative review of patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction.患者报告的乳房重建结果的叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):415. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1528. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
10
Technical Tips to Reduce Implant Rippling in Staged Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction.分阶段胸肌前置乳房重建中减少植入物波纹的技术技巧。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2351-2359. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03616-4. Epub 2023 Sep 13.