From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthodontics, and Division of Clinical Genetics, Nicklaus Children's Hospital; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Toronto; and Department of Orthodontics, University of Valencia.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):1335-1346. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008582.
Passive orthodontic appliances and gingivosupraperiosteoplasty are adjuncts that can be used by surgeons at the time of primary cleft lip repair. These treatments, along with the surgical technique of cleft lip and palate repair, may impact midface growth. The objective of this study was to describe the authors' protocol for unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repair and to evaluate midfacial growth in a cohort of patients at mixed dentition who had undergone presurgical passive orthodontic appliance therapy and gingivosupraperiosteoplasty at the time of unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repair.
Fifteen complete unilateral and 15 complete bilateral cleft lip and palate patients underwent passive orthodontic appliance treatment and primary lip repair with gingivosupraperiosteoplasty. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed by three blinded reviewers. Mean cephalometric measurements at mixed dentition were compared to cephalometric values for noncleft patients, unilateral cleft lip and palate patients who did not undergo gingivoperiosteoplasty or presurgical treatment, and unilateral cleft lip and palate patients who underwent gingivoperiosteoplasty/nasoalveolar molding with independent samples t tests.
Mean cephalometric values were within age-specific normal values for sella-nasion-A point, sella-nasion-B point, A point-nasion-B point, and facial axis. Eighty-seven (13/15) percent of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients and 93 percent (14/15) of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients did not exhibit skeletal class III malocclusion. There was no significant difference between cephalometric values for our patients and patients who did not receive gingivosupraperiosteoplasty or presurgical treatment or who underwent the gingivoperiosteoplasty/nasoalveolar molding protocol.
Presurgical passive orthodontic appliances, combined with gingivosupraperiosteoplasty at the time of lip repair, leads to normal maxillary development in most patients at mixed dentition. Assessment of midface growth at skeletal maturity is required.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
被动正畸矫治器和牙龈骨膜上成形术是外科医生在初次唇裂修复时可使用的辅助手段。这些治疗方法与唇裂腭裂修复的手术技术一起,可能会影响上颌骨的生长。本研究的目的是描述作者单侧和双侧唇裂修复的方案,并评估一组接受过术前被动正畸矫治器治疗和牙龈骨膜上成形术的混合牙列患者的上颌骨生长情况,这些患者在单侧和双侧唇裂修复时同时接受了这些治疗。
15 例完全性单侧唇裂腭裂患者和 15 例完全性双侧唇裂腭裂患者接受了被动正畸矫治器治疗和初次唇修复联合牙龈骨膜上成形术。由三位盲审者分析侧颅面片。将混合牙列的平均头影测量值与非裂隙患者、未行牙龈骨膜上成形术或术前治疗的单侧唇裂腭裂患者以及行牙龈骨膜上成形术/鼻牙槽塑形术的单侧唇裂腭裂患者的头影测量值进行比较,并采用独立样本 t 检验。
平均头影测量值在蝶鞍-前鼻棘点、蝶鞍-后鼻棘点、前鼻棘点-后鼻棘点和面轴的年龄特异性正常值范围内。87%(13/15)的单侧唇裂腭裂患者和 93%(14/15)的双侧唇裂腭裂患者没有表现出骨骼 III 类错牙合。我们的患者与未行牙龈骨膜上成形术或术前治疗或行牙龈骨膜上成形术/鼻牙槽塑形术的患者的头影测量值无显著差异。
唇裂修复时联合应用术前被动正畸矫治器和牙龈骨膜上成形术,可使大多数混合牙列患者的上颌骨正常发育。需要在骨骼成熟时评估上颌骨生长情况。
临床问题/证据水平:治疗,IV。