Maal-Bared Rasha, Li Rui, Suarez Alfredo
Wastewater Treatment Specialist, Scientific Services, EPCOR Water, Canada.
Operations Engineer, Regina Wastewater Treatment Plant, EPCOR Water Prairies, Treatment Plant, 100 Fleming Road, Regina, SK S4M 0A1, Canada.
Waste Manag. 2022 Feb 1;138:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.034. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of leachate co-treatment on a full-scale municipal WWTPby comparing plant performance at varying levels of leachate contributions and hydraulic loadings.Leachate BOD:COD ratio was 0.08 ± 0.07 and indicated a stabilized, old matrix and concentrations of zinc, iron, aluminum, chloride and sulfate were 0.174, 38, 1.47, 1803 and 119.1 mg/L, respectively. The average volumetric leachate ratio (VLR%) was approximately 0.01% corresponding to a daily volume of 30 m but reaching a maximum of 270 m(VLR% = 0.1%) and fluctuating on a daily-basis. A cluster analysis revealed 5 VLR% groupings that were used for subsequent analyses:no leachate, 0 < Low ≤ 0.001, 0.001 < Medium ≤ 0.02, 0.02 < High ≤ 0.05, 0.05 < Very high ≤ 0.2. Treated effluent concentrations of TKN, ammonia, fecal coliforms (FC),E. coli(EC), TSS and TP experienced atrend where effluent quality was improved at low and medium VLR%compared to no leachate addition, but deteriorated in high and very high VLR%.Treated effluent UVT% and EC were not statistically significantly different at varying VLR%, but FC was.Plant hydraulic had a significant impact on removal rates.Ammonia removals and nitrite concentrations improved inhigh flow conditions, whileTP, BOD and cBODremovals deteriorated. Finally,VLR%, leachate COD, TKN ammonia, chloride and arsenic had significant relationships with plant performance. Thus,for leachate with comparable age and strength, VLR% should not exceedlow to medium contributions(0 and 0.02%)during co-treatment at this WWTP.
本研究的目的是通过比较不同渗滤液贡献水平和水力负荷下的工厂性能,评估渗滤液共处理对一座全尺寸城市污水处理厂的影响。渗滤液的生化需氧量与化学需氧量之比为0.08±0.07,表明其为稳定的旧基质,锌、铁、铝、氯化物和硫酸盐的浓度分别为0.174、38、1.47、1803和119.1mg/L。平均渗滤液体积比(VLR%)约为0.01%,对应日体积为30立方米,但最大可达270立方米(VLR% = 0.1%),且每天波动。聚类分析揭示了5个VLR%分组,用于后续分析:无渗滤液、0 < 低≤0.001、0.001 < 中≤0.02、0.02 < 高≤0.05、0.05 < 非常高≤0.2。处理后出水的总凯氏氮、氨、粪大肠菌群(FC)、大肠杆菌(EC)、总悬浮物和总磷浓度呈现出一种趋势,即与不添加渗滤液相比,在低和中VLR%时出水水质得到改善,但在高和非常高VLR%时恶化。处理后出水的紫外透光率(UVT%)和电导率在不同VLR%下无统计学显著差异,但FC有差异。工厂水力条件对去除率有显著影响。在高流量条件下,氨去除率和亚硝酸盐浓度提高,而总磷、生化需氧量和溶解性生化需氧量的去除率恶化。最后,VLR%、渗滤液化学需氧量、总凯氏氮、氨、氯化物和砷与工厂性能有显著关系。因此,对于年龄和强度相当的渗滤液,在该污水处理厂进行共处理时,VLR%不应超过低至中等贡献水平(0和0.02%)。