Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety - Queensland (CARRS-Q), Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.
James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsvile, Queensland 4811, Australia.
J Safety Res. 2021 Dec;79:352-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
This research systematically reviewed relevant studies on users' acceptance of conditional (Level 3) to full (Level 5) automated vehicles when such vehicles are to be used privately (herein referred to as 'private automated vehicles or private AVs).
The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and was undertaken in three databases: APA PsycINFO, Transport Research International Documentation, and Web of Science. Articles were required to focus on individuals' acceptance of private SAE Level 3-5 AVs. Acceptance was defined as individuals' attitudes towards or intentions and/or willingness to use AVs in the future. A total of 2,354 articles were identified in the database search. Thirty-five articles were included in the review, six of which included multiple studies and/or comparison groups.
Most studies (n = 31) applied self-reported measures to assess user acceptance together with a range of psychosocial factors predicting such acceptance. The meta-analytic correlations revealed that perceived behavioral control, perceived benefits/usefulness, perceived ease of use, and subjective/social norms had significant positive pooled relationships with attitudes and intentions. Trust and sensation seeking also had significant positive pooled correlations with intentions, while knowledge of AVs had a significant and negative pooled correlation with intentions. Age did not show any significant pooled relationship with attitudes, intentions, or willingness.
The findings obtained from the systematic review and meta-analysis provide support for psychosocial models to aid understanding of users' acceptance of private AVs. Practical applications: Examining acceptance of AVs after participants have experienced these vehicles on closed tracks or open roads would advance contemporary knowledge of users' intentions to use these vehicles in the future. Further, experiencing these vehicles firsthand may also help with addressing any perceived barriers reducing acceptance of future use of private AVs.
本研究系统地回顾了关于用户对有条件(级别 3)到完全(级别 5)自动化车辆接受程度的相关研究,这些车辆将用于私人用途(以下简称“私人自动化车辆或私人 AVs”)。
搜索遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并在三个数据库中进行:APA PsycINFO、国际交通研究文献和 Web of Science。文章必须集中在个人对私人 SAE 级别 3-5 AVs 的接受程度上。接受程度被定义为个人对未来使用 AVs 的态度、意图和/或意愿。在数据库搜索中总共确定了 2354 篇文章。35 篇文章被纳入审查,其中 6 篇文章包括多项研究和/或比较组。
大多数研究(n=31)应用自我报告的措施来评估用户的接受程度,以及一系列预测这种接受程度的心理社会因素。元分析的相关性表明,感知行为控制、感知收益/有用性、感知易用性以及主观/社会规范与态度和意图具有显著的正相关关系。信任和感觉寻求也与意图有显著的正相关关系,而对 AVs 的了解与意图有显著的负相关关系。年龄与态度、意图或意愿均无显著的正相关关系。
系统评价和荟萃分析的结果为社会心理模型提供了支持,以帮助理解用户对私人 AVs 的接受程度。实际应用:在参与者在封闭轨道或开放道路上体验这些车辆后,检查对 AVs 的接受程度,将有助于了解未来用户使用这些车辆的意图。此外,亲身体验这些车辆也可能有助于解决任何减少未来使用私人 AVs 的接受程度的感知障碍。