Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Neuroscience. 2022 Jan 15;481:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.11.037. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
The primary sensory modality for probing spatial perception can vary among psychophysical paradigms. In the subjective visual vertical (SVV) task, the brain must account for the position of the eye within the orbit to generate an estimate of a visual line orientation, whereas in the subjective haptic vertical (SHV) task, the position of the hand is used to sense the orientation of a haptic bar. Here we investigated whether a hand sensory bias can affect SHV measurement. We measured SHV in 12 subjects (6 left-handed and 6 right-handed) with a forced-choice paradigm using their left and right hands separately. The SHV measurement was less accurate than the SVV measurements (-0.6 ± 0.7) and it was biased in the direction of the hand used in the task but was not affected by handedness; SHV left hand -6.8 ± 2.1° (left-handed -7.9 ± 3.6°, right-handed -5.8 ± 2.5°) and right hand 9.8 ± 1.5° (left-handed 7.4 ± 2.2°, right-handed 12.3 ± 1.8°). SHV measurement with the same hand was also affected by the haptic bar placement on the left or right side versus midline, showing a side effect (left vs midline -2.0 ± 1.3°, right vs midline 3.8 ± 1.7°). Midline SHV measures using the left and right hands were different, confirming a laterality effect (left hand -4.5 ± 1.7°, right hand 6.4 ± 2.0°). These results demonstrate a sensory bias in SHV measurement related to the effects of both hand-in-body (i.e., right vs left hand) and hand-in-space positions. Such modality-specific bias may result in disparity between SHV and SVV measurements, and therefore cannot be generalized to vertical or spatial perception.
用于探测空间感知的主要感觉模态在心理物理范式中可能有所不同。在主观视觉垂直 (SVV) 任务中,大脑必须考虑眼在眼眶中的位置,以生成视觉线方向的估计,而在主观触觉垂直 (SHV) 任务中,手的位置用于感知触觉棒的方向。在这里,我们研究了手的感觉偏差是否会影响 SHV 的测量。我们使用 12 名被试者(6 名左撇子和 6 名右撇子)的强制选择范式分别用左手和右手测量 SHV。SHV 的测量精度低于 SVV 测量值 (-0.6 ± 0.7),并且偏向于任务中使用的手的方向,但不受利手性的影响;SHV 左手为-6.8 ± 2.1°(左撇子为-7.9 ± 3.6°,右撇子为-5.8 ± 2.5°),右手为 9.8 ± 1.5°(左撇子为 7.4 ± 2.2°,右撇子为 12.3 ± 1.8°)。使用相同手的 SHV 测量也受到触觉棒放置在左侧、右侧还是中线相对于中线的影响,显示出一种侧效应(左侧与中线相比为-2.0 ± 1.3°,右侧与中线相比为 3.8 ± 1.7°)。使用左手和右手测量的中线 SHV 不同,证实了一种侧化效应(左手为-4.5 ± 1.7°,右手为 6.4 ± 2.0°)。这些结果表明,在 SHV 测量中存在与手在身体中的位置(即右手与左手)和手在空间中的位置相关的感觉偏差。这种特定感觉模式的偏差可能会导致 SHV 和 SVV 测量之间的差异,因此不能推广到垂直或空间感知。