• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花生过敏儿童经皮免疫治疗的安全性:REALISE 随机临床试验结果。

Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Children: REALISE Randomized Clinical Trial Results.

机构信息

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

Clinique Spécialisée en Allergie de la Capitale, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jul;10(7):1864-1873.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.017
PMID:34848381
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for peanut allergy are limited. In previous clinical trials, epicutaneous immunotherapy with a patch containing 250-μg peanut protein (Viaskin Peanut 250 μg [VP250]) was well tolerated and statistically superior to placebo in desensitizing peanut-allergic children.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the safety of VP250 in children, using a study design approximating potential real-world use.

METHODS

REAL LIfe Use and Safety of EPIT (REALISE) is a phase 3 multicenter study consisting of a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by open-label active treatment. Children aged 4 to 11 years with physician diagnosis of peanut allergy received daily treatment with placebo (6 months) or VP250 (up to 36 months). Data from the 6-month, randomized, controlled phase of REALISE are reported.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-three children were randomized 3:1 to receive VP250 (n = 294) or placebo (n = 99) for 6 months; 284 (72.3%) children had a history of peanut anaphylaxis. According to parent diary, all participants receiving VP250 and 83.8% receiving placebo reported at least 1 episode of local skin reaction, with frequency decreasing over time. Only 4 participants (1.4%) receiving VP250 discontinued because of adverse events (AEs). Epinephrine was administered for allergic reactions attributed to VP250 in 7 children (2.4%), of whom 5 remained in the study; none involved severe anaphylaxis. Overall, AE rates were similar among participants with and without a history of peanut anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In a study designed to mirror real-world use, VP250 was observed to be well tolerated in peanut-allergic children, consistent with previous phase 2b and 3 studies.

摘要

背景

目前治疗花生过敏的方法有限。在之前的临床试验中,经皮免疫治疗贴片(含 250μg 花生蛋白,Viaskin Peanut 250μg[VP250])治疗显示出良好的耐受性,且在使花生过敏儿童脱敏方面显著优于安慰剂。

目的

采用近似实际应用的研究设计,评估 VP250 在儿童中的安全性。

方法

REAL LIfe Use and Safety of EPIT(REALISE)是一项多中心 3 期临床试验,包括 6 个月的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照期和随后的开放标签活性治疗期。4 至 11 岁经医生诊断为花生过敏的儿童,接受安慰剂(6 个月)或 VP250(长达 36 个月)的每日治疗。本文报告 REALISE 6 个月随机对照期的数据。

结果

393 名儿童随机分为 3:1 接受 VP250(n=294)或安慰剂(n=99)治疗 6 个月;284 名(72.3%)儿童有花生过敏史。根据家长日记,接受 VP250 治疗的所有参与者和接受安慰剂治疗的 83.8%参与者均报告至少有 1 次局部皮肤反应发作,且频率随时间降低。仅有 4 名(1.4%)接受 VP250 治疗的儿童因不良事件(AE)而停药。7 名(2.4%)接受 VP250 治疗的儿童因与 VP250 相关的过敏反应而使用肾上腺素,其中 5 名仍在研究中;均未发生严重过敏反应。总体而言,有或无花生过敏史的参与者的 AE 发生率相似。

结论

在设计用于模拟实际应用的研究中,VP250 在花生过敏儿童中表现出良好的耐受性,与之前的 2b 期和 3 期研究一致。

相似文献

1
Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Peanut-Allergic Children: REALISE Randomized Clinical Trial Results.花生过敏儿童经皮免疫治疗的安全性:REALISE 随机临床试验结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jul;10(7):1864-1873.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
2
Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults.用于治疗儿童和青年花生过敏的经皮免疫疗法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Apr;139(4):1242-1252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
3
Epicutaneous immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy: Follow-up from the Consortium for Food Allergy Research.经皮免疫治疗治疗花生过敏:食物过敏研究联盟的随访研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Mar;147(3):992-1003.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Efficacy and safety of peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy in patients with atopic comorbidities.花生表皮免疫疗法在特应性合并症患者中的疗效与安全性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2022 Sep 22;2(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.07.009. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Phase 3 Trial of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Toddlers with Peanut Allergy.婴幼儿花生过敏的经皮免疫治疗 3 期临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 11;388(19):1755-1766. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212895.
6
Effect of Varying Doses of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Exposure Among Patients With Peanut Sensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.不同剂量表皮免疫疗法与安慰剂对花生敏感患者花生蛋白暴露反应的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1798-1809. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16591.
7
Epicutaneous immunotherapy with Viaskin Peanut in toddlers: a plain language summary.经皮免疫治疗幼儿花生过敏:通俗易懂的概述。
Immunotherapy. 2024 Jan;16(1):5-13. doi: 10.2217/imt-2023-0201. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
8
Long-term, open-label extension study of the efficacy and safety of epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: PEOPLE 3-year results.儿童变应原皮内免疫治疗的疗效和安全性的长期、开放性扩展研究:PEOPLE 研究 3 年结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;146(4):863-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.028. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
9
Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial.表皮免疫治疗与安慰剂对花生过敏儿童进食花生蛋白反应的影响:PEPITES 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-955. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1113.
10
Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy with AR101 in European children with a peanut allergy (ARTEMIS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.AR101 口服免疫治疗欧洲花生过敏儿童的疗效和安全性(ARTEMIS):一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照 3 期试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Oct;4(10):728-739. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30234-0. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunotherapeutic Approaches to Peanut Allergy Treatment-Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies: A Comprehensive Review.花生过敏治疗的免疫治疗方法——临床前和临床研究:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 12;14(6):1902. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061902.
2
Epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食物过敏的经皮免疫疗法:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2025 Mar;15(3):e70045. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70045.
3
Epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.食物过敏的经皮免疫疗法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 2;14(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02727-6.
4
Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy.用于治疗花生过敏的经皮免疫疗法。
Allergy. 2025 Jan;80(1):63-76. doi: 10.1111/all.16324. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
5
Racial and Ethnic Representation in Food Allergen Immunotherapy Trial Participants: A Systematic Review.食物过敏原免疫疗法试验参与者中的种族和族裔代表性:一项系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32710.
6
From Skin to Solution: Exploring Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.从皮肤到解决方案:探索花生过敏的经皮免疫治疗——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2024 Apr;66(2):125-137. doi: 10.1007/s12016-024-08990-8. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
The Future of Food Allergy Management: Advancements in Therapies.食物过敏管理的未来:疗法的进步。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Apr;24(4):161-171. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01133-1. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
8
Food Allergen Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with IgE-Mediated Food Allergy.食物过敏原免疫治疗 IgE 介导的食物过敏患者的治疗。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 9;60(1):121. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010121.
9
Feast for thought: A comprehensive review of food allergy 2021-2023.值得深思:2021-2023 年食物过敏的全面综述。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Mar;153(3):576-594. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.11.918. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
10
Recent advances in epicutaneous immunotherapy and potential applications in food allergy.经皮免疫疗法的最新进展及其在食物过敏中的潜在应用。
Front Allergy. 2023 Oct 27;4:1290003. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1290003. eCollection 2023.