Suppr超能文献

气管切开套管拔管与意识障碍演变。

Tracheostomy Decannulation and Disorders of Consciousness Evolution.

机构信息

Santa Catalina Neurorehabilitación Clínica, Buenos Aires City, Argentina and Hospital General de Agudos Dr. I. Pirovano, Buenos Aires City, Argentina.

Santa Catalina Neurorehabilitación Clínica, Buenos Aires City, Argentina and Hospital Universitario UAI, Buenos Aires City, Argentina.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2022 Feb;67(2):209-215. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08301. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy is a frequent surgical procedure in subjects with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC). There is no consensus about safety of tracheostomy decannulation in this population.The aim of our study was to estimate if DOC improvement is a predictor for tracheostomy decannulation. Secondary outcomes include mortality rate and discharge destination.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, retrospective, case-control study at a weaning and rehabilitation center (WRC). We included tracheostomized subjects with DOC admitted between August 2015 and December 2017. We matched groups based on the consciousness level at admission assessed withthe coma recovery scale revised (CRS-R). Subjects who were later decannulated formed the cases, while those that remained tracheostomized at the end of follow-up formed the controls. Improvement of DOC was defined as a progress in the categories of the CRS-R.

RESULTS

22 subjects were included in each group. No significant differences were found in clinical and demographic variables, except that controls had longer neurologic injury evolution (65.5 vs 51 days, = .047), more tracheostomy days at admission to ourinstitution (53 vs 33.5, = .02), and higher prevalence of neurological comorbidities (12 vs 4, = .03). Subjects who improved their DOC had more chances of being decannulated (OR 11.28, 95% CI 1.96-123.08). Tracheostomy decannulation could not be achieved in most subjects who did not improve from vegetative state (VS) (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.60). 8 subjects, however, could be decannulated in VS, with only one decannulation failure and no deaths. Mortality was higher in controls (0 vs 6, = .02), especially among VS (0 vs 5, = .049). No significant differences were found in discharge destination between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects who improve their DOC are more likely to achieve tracheostomy decannulation. Some subjects in VS were decannulated, with lower mortality than those who remained tracheostomized.

摘要

背景

气管切开术是慢性意识障碍(DOC)患者的常见手术。对于该人群,气管切开套管是否可以安全拔除尚无共识。我们的研究目的是评估 DOC 的改善是否可预测气管切开套管的拔除。次要结局包括死亡率和出院去向。

方法

我们在一家脱机和康复中心(WRC)进行了一项观察性、回顾性、病例对照研究。我们纳入了 2015 年 8 月至 2017 年 12 月间因 DOC 而接受气管切开术的患者。根据入院时使用昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)评估的意识水平进行分组。随后套管被拔除的患者为病例组,而在随访结束时仍保持气管切开的患者为对照组。DOC 的改善定义为 CRS-R 各分类的进展。

结果

每组纳入 22 例患者。除对照组的神经损伤进展时间更长(65.5 天比 51 天, =.047)、入组时的气管切开天数更长(53 天比 33.5 天, =.02)和神经合并症发生率更高(12 比 4, =.03)外,两组在临床和人口统计学变量方面无显著差异。DOC 改善的患者更有可能被拔除套管(OR 11.28,95%CI 1.96-123.08)。大多数从植物状态(VS)未改善的患者无法成功拔管(OR 0.13,95%CI 0.02-0.60)。然而,有 8 例 VS 患者可以拔管,仅有 1 例拔管失败且无死亡。对照组的死亡率更高(0 比 6, =.02),尤其是 VS 患者(0 比 5, =.049)。两组间的出院去向无显著差异。

结论

DOC 改善的患者更有可能实现气管切开套管的拔除。一些 VS 患者被拔管,其死亡率低于那些仍保持气管切开的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验