Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Emergency Care Services in Jordan: Integration of Patient Centeredness Model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Accreditation is viewed to enhance the total quality of healthcare. The present study aims at assessing patients' perspectives toward the quality of emergency healthcare services at different hospitals with different characteristics in Jordan. The elements of patients' perception were aligned with the conceptual framework of Patient Centeredness Model.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in four emergency departments from different healthcare sectors and accreditation statuses in Jordan. Less urgent/nonurgent, alert, and cooperative patients were identified directly after the completion of emergency treatment. The perspectives of patients about the quality of emergency services were evaluated by 10 domains articulated in a validated accident and emergency questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients were enrolled in the study. Private sector scored higher in all assessment domains in both accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in comparison with the government sector. Accredited government hospitals scored higher in patients' evaluation for "doctor and nurse," "investigations," "pain," and "overall respect of medical staff" domains than nonaccredited government hospitals. The overall experience was significantly different between accredited and nonaccredited government hospitals.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Quality of emergency care services should be assessed through various dimensions related to patients' perspectives. Patients' perception toward the quality of emergency health services is evidently enhanced by accreditation especially in the government sector.