Suppr超能文献

他汀类药物治疗与脂蛋白(a)水平:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Statin therapy and lipoprotein(a) levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

de Boer Lotte M, Oorthuys Anna O J, Wiegman Albert, Langendam Miranda W, Kroon Jeffrey, Spijker René, Zwinderman Aeilko H, Hutten Barbara A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 May 5;29(5):779-792. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab171.

Abstract

AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal and independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). People with elevated Lp(a) are often prescribed statins as they also often show elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. While statins are well-established in lowering LDL-C, their effect on Lp(a) remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of statins compared to placebo on Lp(a) and the effects of different types and intensities of statin therapy on Lp(a).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with a statin and placebo arm. Medline and EMBASE were searched until August 2019. Quality assessment of studies was done using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2). Mean difference of absolute and percentage changes of Lp(a) in the statin vs. the placebo arms were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. We compared effects of different types and intensities of statin therapy using subgroup- and network meta-analyses. Certainty of the evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Overall, 39 studies (24 448 participants) were included. Mean differences (95% confidence interval) of absolute and percentage changes in the statin vs. the placebo arms were 1.1 mg/dL (0.5-1.6, P < 0.0001) and 0.1% (-3.6% to 4.0%, P = 0.95), respectively (moderate-certainty evidence). None of the types of statins changed Lp(a) significantly compared to placebo (very low- to high-certainty evidence), as well as intensities of statin therapy (low- to moderate-certainty evidence).

CONCLUSION

Statin therapy does not lead to clinically important differences in Lp(a) compared to placebo in patients at risk for CVD. Our findings suggest that in these patients, statin therapy will not change Lp(a)-associated CVD risk.

摘要

目的

脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]是心血管疾病(CVD)的一个因果性独立危险因素。Lp(a)升高的患者通常也会出现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平升高,因此常被处方使用他汀类药物。虽然他汀类药物在降低LDL-C方面已得到充分证实,但其对Lp(a)的影响仍不明确。我们评估了他汀类药物与安慰剂相比对Lp(a)的影响,以及不同类型和强度的他汀类药物治疗对Lp(a)的影响。

方法和结果

我们对有他汀类药物组和安慰剂组的随机试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了Medline和EMBASE直至2019年8月。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)对研究进行质量评估。采用随机效应荟萃分析汇总他汀类药物组与安慰剂组中Lp(a)绝对变化和百分比变化的均值差异。我们使用亚组分析和网状荟萃分析比较了不同类型和强度的他汀类药物治疗的效果。使用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)确定证据的确定性。总体而言,纳入了39项研究(24448名参与者)。他汀类药物组与安慰剂组中Lp(a)绝对变化和百分比变化的均值差异(95%置信区间)分别为1.1mg/dL(0.5-1.6,P<0.0001)和0.1%(-3.6%至4.0%,P=0.95)(中等确定性证据)。与安慰剂相比,没有一种他汀类药物类型能显著改变Lp(a)(极低至高度确定性证据),他汀类药物治疗强度也是如此(低至中等确定性证据)。

结论

在有CVD风险的患者中,与安慰剂相比,他汀类药物治疗在Lp(a)方面未导致临床上的重要差异。我们的研究结果表明,在这些患者中,他汀类药物治疗不会改变与Lp(a)相关的CVD风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验