• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节内富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节痛的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机临床试验。

Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasma vs Corticosteroid Injections for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):1266-1271. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab332.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnab332
PMID:34850180
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Using stringent inclusion criteria, a double-blinded study protocol, and fluoroscopically guided injections, we compare intra-articular sacroiliac joint platelet-rich plasma injections with intra-articular steroids.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Two large university-based interdisciplinary spine centers.

SUBJECTS

A total of 26 patients with a positive diagnostic block (>80% relief).

METHODS

Subjects who had a positive diagnostic block were randomized to undergo either a fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injection of steroid or a platelet-rich plasma injection. Follow-up was at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes included level of pain, as indicated on a 0- to 100-mm numeric pain rating scale, and functional disability score, obtained via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

At 1, 3, and 6 months, both groups improved; however, subjects who received steroid injections reported lower pain scores than did subjects who received platelet-rich plasma. Using categorical data, we observed significantly more responders (defined as pain scores that improved by 50% or more from baseline) at 1 and 3 months in the group who received steroids than in the group who received platelet-rich plasma.

CONCLUSION

Although both groups showed improvements in pain and function, the steroid group had significantly greater response and significantly more responders than did the platelet-rich plasma group.

摘要

目的

采用严格的纳入标准、双盲研究方案和荧光引导注射,我们比较了关节内富血小板血浆注射与关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节。

设计

双盲、随机对照试验。

地点

两个大型的大学间脊柱中心。

受试者

共 26 例诊断性阻滞阳性(>80%缓解)的患者。

方法

对诊断性阻滞阳性的患者进行随机分组,接受荧光引导下关节内皮质类固醇注射或富血小板血浆注射。随访时间为 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月。结果包括疼痛程度(0-100mm 数字疼痛评分量表)和功能障碍评分(通过 Oswestry 残疾指数[ODI]获得)。

结果

在 1、3 和 6 个月时,两组均有改善;然而,接受皮质类固醇注射的患者报告的疼痛评分低于接受富血小板血浆注射的患者。使用分类数据,我们观察到在 1 个月和 3 个月时,接受皮质类固醇注射的患者中,有更多的应答者(定义为疼痛评分比基线改善 50%或更多),明显多于接受富血小板血浆注射的患者。

结论

虽然两组在疼痛和功能方面均有改善,但皮质类固醇组的反应明显更好,应答者明显多于富血小板血浆组。

相似文献

1
Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasma vs Corticosteroid Injections for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.关节内富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节痛的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机临床试验。
Pain Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):1266-1271. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab332.
2
Steroid vs. Platelet-Rich Plasma in Ultrasound-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injection for Chronic Low Back Pain.超声引导下骶髂关节注射治疗慢性下腰痛:类固醇与富血小板血浆的疗效比较。
Pain Pract. 2017 Jul;17(6):782-791. doi: 10.1111/papr.12526. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
A Prospective Study Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma and Local Anesthetic (LA)/Corticosteroid in Intra-Articular Injection for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome.一项比较富血小板血浆与局部麻醉剂/皮质类固醇关节内注射治疗腰椎小关节综合征的前瞻性研究。
Pain Pract. 2017 Sep;17(7):914-924. doi: 10.1111/papr.12544. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain.一项关节内富血小板血浆注射与皮质类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节疼痛的随机对照试验。
J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Dec;16(12):1285-90. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0031.
5
Intra-articular Steroids vs Saline for Lumbar Z-Joint Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.关节内类固醇与盐水治疗腰椎 Z 关节疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Pain Med. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):246-251. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny225.
6
Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.超声引导与透视引导下非炎症性骶髂关节功能障碍骶髂关节关节内注射:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
7
Fluoroscopically Guided Diagnostic and Therapeutic Intra-Articular Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Systematic Review.透视引导下诊断性和治疗性骶髂关节腔内注射:一项系统评价
Pain Med. 2015 Aug;16(8):1500-18. doi: 10.1111/pme.12833. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Relieving Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.超声引导富血小板血浆注射治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的疗效。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug;99(8):689-693. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001389.
9
The Success Rate of Ultrasound-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Steroid Injections in Sacroiliitis: Are We Getting Better?超声引导下骶髂关节类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节炎的成功率:我们是否做得更好?
Pain Pract. 2021 Apr;21(4):404-410. doi: 10.1111/papr.12967. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
10
Fluoroscopically Guided vs Landmark-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Randomized Controlled Study.荧光引导与体表标志引导骶髂关节注射:一项随机对照研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):628-642. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.038. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Autologous Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Steroid in Ultrasound-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Injection for Joint Dysfunction: Randomized Comparative Study.自体富血小板纤维蛋白与类固醇用于超声引导下骶髂关节注射治疗关节功能障碍的随机对照研究
Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Feb 16;15(1):e158219. doi: 10.5812/aapm-158219. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
2
A Systematic Review of Sacroiliac Joint Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma (Prp) and Stem Cells.富血小板血浆(PRP)和干细胞骶髂关节注射的系统评价
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Mar 17;29(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11916-025-01377-0.
3
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: anatomy, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment approaches.
骶髂关节功能障碍:解剖学、病理生理学、鉴别诊断及治疗方法
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Jun;54(6):1195-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04831-z. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Chondrotoxicity of Intra-Articular Injection Treatment: A Scoping Review.关节内注射治疗的软骨毒性:范围综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 26;25(13):7010. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137010.
5
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
6
Advances in Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Spinal Diseases: A Systematic Review.富血小板血浆治疗脊柱疾病的研究进展:系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 21;24(8):7677. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087677.
7
Current State of Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Rheumatic Disease: A Retrospective Review of the Literature.富血小板血浆治疗风湿性疾病的现状:文献回顾性研究。
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2023;19(4):400-407. doi: 10.2174/1573397119666230420112017.