关节内富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节痛的疗效比较:一项双盲、随机临床试验。
Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasma vs Corticosteroid Injections for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
出版信息
Pain Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):1266-1271. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab332.
OBJECTIVE
Using stringent inclusion criteria, a double-blinded study protocol, and fluoroscopically guided injections, we compare intra-articular sacroiliac joint platelet-rich plasma injections with intra-articular steroids.
DESIGN
Double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
Two large university-based interdisciplinary spine centers.
SUBJECTS
A total of 26 patients with a positive diagnostic block (>80% relief).
METHODS
Subjects who had a positive diagnostic block were randomized to undergo either a fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injection of steroid or a platelet-rich plasma injection. Follow-up was at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes included level of pain, as indicated on a 0- to 100-mm numeric pain rating scale, and functional disability score, obtained via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
RESULTS
At 1, 3, and 6 months, both groups improved; however, subjects who received steroid injections reported lower pain scores than did subjects who received platelet-rich plasma. Using categorical data, we observed significantly more responders (defined as pain scores that improved by 50% or more from baseline) at 1 and 3 months in the group who received steroids than in the group who received platelet-rich plasma.
CONCLUSION
Although both groups showed improvements in pain and function, the steroid group had significantly greater response and significantly more responders than did the platelet-rich plasma group.
目的
采用严格的纳入标准、双盲研究方案和荧光引导注射,我们比较了关节内富血小板血浆注射与关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗骶髂关节。
设计
双盲、随机对照试验。
地点
两个大型的大学间脊柱中心。
受试者
共 26 例诊断性阻滞阳性(>80%缓解)的患者。
方法
对诊断性阻滞阳性的患者进行随机分组,接受荧光引导下关节内皮质类固醇注射或富血小板血浆注射。随访时间为 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月。结果包括疼痛程度(0-100mm 数字疼痛评分量表)和功能障碍评分(通过 Oswestry 残疾指数[ODI]获得)。
结果
在 1、3 和 6 个月时,两组均有改善;然而,接受皮质类固醇注射的患者报告的疼痛评分低于接受富血小板血浆注射的患者。使用分类数据,我们观察到在 1 个月和 3 个月时,接受皮质类固醇注射的患者中,有更多的应答者(定义为疼痛评分比基线改善 50%或更多),明显多于接受富血小板血浆注射的患者。
结论
虽然两组在疼痛和功能方面均有改善,但皮质类固醇组的反应明显更好,应答者明显多于富血小板血浆组。