Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Clinical Trial Planning and Management, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Digestion. 2022;103(2):159-168. doi: 10.1159/000520276. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
Although endocytoscopy (EC) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) is effective in diagnosing gastric cancer, no diagnostic system has been validated. We explored a specific diagnostic system for gastric cancer using EC with NBI.
Equal numbers of images from cancerous and noncancerous areas (114 images each) were assessed by endoscopists with (development group: 33) and without (validation group: 28) specific training in magnifying endoscopy with NBI. Microvascular and microsurface patterns (MS) in each image were evaluated. Lesions were diagnosed as cancerous when patterns were deemed "irregular." The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a diagnosis according to patterns on EC with NBI (microvascular pattern [MV] alone, MS alone, and both) were evaluated and compared between groups to determine the diagnostic performance.
In the development and validation groups, diagnoses based on the MV alone had significantly higher accuracy (91.7% vs. 76.3%, p < 0.0001 and 92.5% vs. 67.5%, p < 0.0001, respectively) and sensitivity (88.6% vs. 68.3%, p < 0.0001 and 89.5% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.0001, respectively) than those based on the MS alone. In both groups, there were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between using the MV alone and both patterns.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the MV alone is a simple and accurate diagnostic method for gastric cancer. This system could find widespread applications in clinical practice.
虽然窄带成像内镜检查(EC)在诊断胃癌方面很有效,但还没有经过验证的诊断系统。我们探索了一种使用窄带成像内镜检查(NBI)的 EC 特定的胃癌诊断系统。
由具有(发展组:33 人)和不具有(验证组:28 人)NBI 放大内镜特定培训的内镜医师评估来自癌症和非癌症区域的等量图像(各 114 张图像)。评估每个图像的微血管和微表面模式(MS)。当模式被认为“不规则”时,将病变诊断为癌症。评估并比较根据 EC 中 NBI 的模式(单独的微血管模式 [MV]、单独的 MS 和两者)进行诊断的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以确定诊断性能。
在发展组和验证组中,基于 MV 单独的诊断具有显著更高的准确性(91.7%对 76.3%,p<0.0001 和 92.5%对 67.5%,p<0.0001,分别)和敏感性(88.6%对 68.3%,p<0.0001 和 89.5%对 38.6%,p<0.0001,分别)比基于 MS 单独的诊断。在两组中,单独使用 MV 与同时使用两种模式之间的诊断准确性没有显著差异。
讨论/结论:单独评估 MV 是一种简单而准确的胃癌诊断方法。该系统可能在临床实践中得到广泛应用。