• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植中的边缘供肝对住院时间的影响有限。

Marginal allografts in liver transplantation have a limited impact on length of stay.

作者信息

Goff Cameron, Zhang Theodore, McDonald Malcolm, Anand Adrish, Galvan Nhu Thao Nguyen, Kanwal Fasiha, Cholankeril George, Hernaez Ruben, Goss John A, Rana Abbas

机构信息

Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E DeBakey Department of General Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2022 Mar;36(3):e14544. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14544. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14544
PMID:34854503
Abstract

The study of marginal liver transplant outcomes, including post-transplant length of stay (LOS), is necessary for determining the practicality of their use. 50 155 patients who received transplants from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed with data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression. Six different definitions were used to classify an allograft as being marginal: 90 percentile Donor Risk Index (DRI) allografts, donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, national share donors, donors over 70, donors with > 30% macrovesicular steatosis, or 90 percentile Discard Risk Index donors. 24% (n = 12 124) of subjects received marginal allografts. Average LOS was 15.6 days among those who received standard allografts. Among those who received marginal allografts, LOS was found to be highest in those who received 90 percentile DRI allografts at 15.6 days, and lowest in those who received DCD allografts at 12.7 days. Apart from fatty livers (95% CI .86-.98), marginal allografts were not associated with a prolonged LOS. We conclude that accounting for experience and recipient matching, transplant centers may be more aggressive in their use of extended criteria donors with limited fear of increasing LOS and its associated costs.

摘要

研究边缘性肝移植的结果,包括移植后的住院时间(LOS),对于确定其应用的实用性很有必要。利用移植受者科学注册数据库的数据,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和多变量Cox回归,对2012年至2020年接受移植的50155例患者进行了回顾性分析。采用六种不同的定义将同种异体移植物分类为边缘性:第90百分位供体风险指数(DRI)的同种异体移植物、心脏死亡后捐赠(DCD)供体、全国共享供体、70岁以上供体、大泡性脂肪变性>30%的供体或第90百分位丢弃风险指数供体。24%(n = 12124)的受试者接受了边缘性同种异体移植物。接受标准同种异体移植物的患者平均住院时间为15.6天。在接受边缘性同种异体移植物的患者中,接受第90百分位DRI同种异体移植物的患者住院时间最长,为15.6天,而接受DCD同种异体移植物的患者住院时间最短,为12.7天。除脂肪肝外(95%CI.86-.98),边缘性同种异体移植物与住院时间延长无关。我们得出结论,考虑到经验和受者匹配情况,移植中心在使用扩展标准供体时可能会更积极,而不必过于担心住院时间及其相关成本的增加。

相似文献

1
Marginal allografts in liver transplantation have a limited impact on length of stay.肝移植中的边缘供肝对住院时间的影响有限。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Mar;36(3):e14544. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14544. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
2
Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants.中心容积对高危肝移植结局的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct;17(10):1191-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22343.
3
Trends in Outcomes for Marginal Allografts in Liver Transplant.肝移植中边缘供肝移植物的预后趋势
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2484.
4
Trends in Outcomes for Marginal Allografts in Liver Transplant.肝移植中边缘供肝的预后趋势
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 5;155(10):926-32. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2484.
5
Donation after cardiac death kidneys are suitable for pediatric recipients.心脏死亡后捐赠的肾脏适合小儿受者。
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 Nov;23(7):e13540. doi: 10.1111/petr.13540. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
6
Hospital Resource Use with Donation after Cardiac Death Allografts in Liver Transplantation: A Matched Controlled Analysis from 2007 to 2011.心脏死亡后肝脏移植中供体肝脏移植的医院资源利用:2007年至2011年的匹配对照分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):951-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.052. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
7
Living Donation Versus Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation for Low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Recipients.活体捐赠与循环死亡后肝脏移植在低终末期肝病模型受体中的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):580-587. doi: 10.1002/lt.25073. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Liver transplant outcomes using ideal donation after circulatory death livers are superior to using older donation after brain death donor livers.使用循环死亡后理想供肝进行肝移植的结果优于使用脑死亡供体的较老供肝。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Sep;22(9):1197-204. doi: 10.1002/lt.24494.
9
Should more donation after cardiac death livers be used in pediatric transplantation?心脏死亡后捐赠的肝脏是否应更多地用于小儿移植?
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 Feb;23(1):e13323. doi: 10.1111/petr.13323. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
Single-Center Experience Using Marginal Liver Grafts in Korea.韩国使用边缘性肝移植的单中心经验。
Transplant Proc. 2018 May;50(4):1147-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.01.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic variation in utilization of deceased donor livers in the United States in the era of advanced perfusion.在先进灌注时代美国已故捐赠者肝脏利用情况的地域差异。
Liver Transpl. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000687.
2
A Three Decade Analysis of Trends in Length of Stay After Liver Transplantation.肝移植术后住院时间趋势的三十年分析
Prog Transplant. 2025 Jun;35(2):55-63. doi: 10.1177/15269248251327428. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
3
Machine Perfusion for Extended Criteria Donor Livers: What Challenges Remain?边缘供肝的机器灌注:仍存在哪些挑战?
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 3;11(17):5218. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175218.