Suppr超能文献

西罗莫司和抗坏血酸洗脱支架系统的首次人体临床评估:一项多中心、受试者盲法、随机研究。

A First-in-Man Clinical Evaluation of Sirolimus and Ascorbic Acid-Eluting Stent Systems: a Multicenter, Subject-Blinded, Randomized Study.

作者信息

Lim Young-Hyo, Youn Ji Hyun, Hong Soon-Jun, Ahn Tae-Hoon, Yoon Junghan, Park Jun-Kyu, Kim Hyo-Soo

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

CG Bio Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2021 Dec;51(12):1001-1014. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0161.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of D+Storm™ drug-eluting stent (DES) and BioMatrix Flex™ DES.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, subject-single-blind, randomized, and confirmed comparative clinical trial. According to the inclusion criteria, those diagnosed with stable angina, unstable angina, silent ischemia, or non-ST-segment myocardial infarction were selected among patients with coronary artery stenosis as subjects. Among the subjects with 50% stenosis on coronary angiography, the experiment was performed on those who had a lesion with reference vessel 2.5-4.0 mm in diameter and ≤40 mm in length. The primary endpoint was an in-segment late loss and the secondary endpoints were in-stent late lumen loss, stent malapposition, the incidence of mortality, myocardial infarction, reoperation, and stent thrombosis at 36 weeks.

RESULTS

57 patients in the D+Storm™ DES group and 55 patients in the BioMatrix Flex™ DES group were enrolled in the study. Fifty-seven patients in the D+Storm™ DES group and Fifty-five patients in the BioMatrix Flex™ DES group were enrolled in the study. An average of in-segment late lumen loss was 0.08±0.13 mm in the D+Storm™ DES group and 0.14±0.32 mm in the BioMatrix Flex™ DES group with no significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.879). In addition, there was no significant difference in adverse events between D+Storm™ DES and BioMatrix Flex™ DES.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness and safety of D+Storm™ DES implantation in patients with coronary artery disease over a 36-week follow-up period.

摘要

背景与目的

开展此项临床试验以评估D+Storm™药物洗脱支架(DES)和BioMatrix Flex™ DES的安全性与有效性。

方法

本研究为多中心、受试者单盲、随机且经过确认的对比临床试验。根据纳入标准,在冠状动脉狭窄患者中选取诊断为稳定型心绞痛、不稳定型心绞痛、无症状性心肌缺血或非ST段心肌梗死的患者作为研究对象。在冠状动脉造影显示狭窄50%的受试者中,对那些病变参考血管直径为2.5 - 4.0毫米且长度≤40毫米的患者进行试验。主要终点为节段内晚期管腔丢失,次要终点为支架内晚期管腔丢失、支架贴壁不良、36周时的死亡率、心肌梗死发生率、再次手术率及支架血栓形成发生率。

结果

D+Storm™ DES组纳入57例患者,BioMatrix Flex™ DES组纳入55例患者。D+Storm™ DES组节段内晚期管腔丢失平均为0.08±0.13毫米,BioMatrix Flex™ DES组为0.14±0.32毫米,两组间无显著差异(p = 0.879)。此外,D+Storm™ DES与BioMatrix Flex™ DES在不良事件方面无显著差异。

结论

本研究证实在36周的随访期内,D+Storm™ DES植入冠心病患者具有临床有效性及安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d71/8636762/bb22ff8c7bc4/kcj-51-1001-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验