Health Policy Research Center-Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 1;140(1):79-84. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5072.
Despite documented disparities in health care for patients with significant vision impairments and legal mandates that patients with disability receive equitable care, little is known about the extent to which physicians practicing in the US accommodate these patients in outpatient clinical settings.
To empirically explore the extent of basic accommodations physicians practicing in the US provide to patients with significant vision limitations in outpatient care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this physician survey study, randomly selected physicians were surveyed throughout the US on their attitudes toward patients with disability. A total of 1400 randomly selected active board-certified physicians representing 7 specialties (family medicine, general internal medicine, rheumatology, neurology, ophthalmology, orthopedic surgery, and obstetrics-gynecology) were surveyed. Data were collected from October 2019 to June 2020.
Reported use of basic accommodations when caring for patients with significant vision limitations (defined here as blind or significant difficulty seeing even with glasses or other corrective lenses). Physicians' accommodation performance was assessed based on whether they always or usually described the clinic space and always or usually provided printed material in large font. Use of Braille materials was reported too rarely to include in analyses.
Of the 462 survey participants, 297 of 457 (65.0%) were male. The weighted response rate was 61.0%. Only 48 physicians (9.1%; 95% CI, 6.6-12.3) provided both accommodations (always or usually describing clinic spaces and providing large-font materials), while 267 (60.2%; 95% CI, 55.3-65.0) provided neither of these accommodations. Although 62.8% (95% CI, 57.5-67.8; n = 245) of nonophthalmologists did not provide either accommodation, 29.3% (95% CI, 20.1-40.7; n = 22) of ophthalmologists also did not do so; only 24.0% (95% CI, 15.6-35.0; n = 18) of ophthalmologists provided both accommodations compared with 8.4% (95% CI, 5.4-12.7) of other physicians.
This survey study suggests that less than one-tenth of physicians practicing in the US who care for patients with significant vision limitations usually or always describe clinic spaces or provide large-font materials, and less than one-third of ophthalmologists do so. Actions to address this seem warranted.
尽管有文献记载表明,视力严重受损的患者在医疗保健方面存在差异,并且法律规定残疾患者应获得公平的护理,但对于美国医生在门诊临床环境中为这些患者提供服务的程度知之甚少。
实证探讨美国医生为门诊视力严重受限的患者提供基本便利的程度。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项医生调查研究中,我们在美国各地随机选择医生,调查他们对残疾患者的态度。共有 1400 名来自 7 个专业的随机选择的在职、 board-certified 医生(家庭医学、普通内科、风湿病学、神经病学、眼科、骨科和妇产科)接受了调查。数据收集于 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 6 月。
报告在照顾视力严重受限的患者(这里定义为失明或即使戴眼镜或其他矫正镜片也有严重视力障碍)时使用的基本便利设施。根据医生是否始终或通常描述诊所空间以及始终或通常提供大字体材料,评估医生的便利设施使用情况。由于使用盲文材料的情况很少,因此未将其纳入分析。
在 462 名参与调查的医生中,457 名(65.0%)为男性。加权应答率为 61.0%。只有 48 名医生(9.1%;95%CI,6.6-12.3)提供了这两种便利设施(始终或通常描述诊所空间并提供大字体材料),而 267 名医生(60.2%;95%CI,55.3-65.0)则没有提供这两种便利设施。尽管 62.8%(95%CI,57.5-67.8;n=245)的非眼科医生未提供任何一种便利设施,但 29.3%(95%CI,20.1-40.7;n=22)的眼科医生也未提供便利设施;只有 24.0%(95%CI,15.6-35.0;n=18)的眼科医生提供了这两种便利设施,而 8.4%(95%CI,5.4-12.7)的其他医生则提供了便利设施。
这项调查研究表明,美国约十分之一的为视力严重受限的患者提供护理的医生通常或总是描述诊所空间或提供大字体材料,不到三分之一的眼科医生这样做。似乎有必要采取行动来解决这个问题。