Suppr超能文献

基于单分散微泡的三维对比增强超声能否降低定量异质性?一项体外研究。

Can monodisperse microbubble-based three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound reduce quantitative heterogeneity? An in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Fetal Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Ultrasomics Artificial Intelligence X-Lab, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Mar;31(3):307-315. doi: 10.17219/acem/143585.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity within the tumor may cause large heterogeneity in quantitative perfusion parameters. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) can show the spatial relationship of vascular structure after post-acquisition reconstruction and monodisperse bubbles can resonate the ultrasound pulse, resulting in the increase in sensitivity of CEUS imaging.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the combination of 3D-CEUS and monodisperse microbubbles could reduce the heterogeneity of quantitative CEUS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three in vitro perfusion models with perfusion volume ratio of 1:2:4 were set up. Both quantitative 2D-CEUS and 3D-CEUS were used to acquire peak intensity (PI) with 2 kinds of ultrasound agents. One was a new kind of monodisperse bubbles produced in this study, named Octafluoropropane-loaded cerasomal microbubbles (OC-MBs), the other was SonoVue®. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to evaluate the cross-sectional variability. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between weighted PIs (average of PIs of 3 different planes) and perfusion ratios.

RESULTS

The average CVs of quantitative 3D-CEUS was slightly lower than that of 2D-CEUS (0.41 ±0.17 compared to 0.55 ±0.26, p = 0.3592). As for quantitative 3D-CEUS, the PI of the OC-MBs has shown better stability than that of SonoVue®, but without a significant difference (average CVs: 0.32 ±0.19 compared to 0.50 ±0.10, p = 0.0711). In the 2D-CEUS condition, the average CVs of OC-MBs group and SonoVue® group were 0.68 ±0.15 and 0.41 ±0.17 (p = 0.2747). As for 3D-CEUS condition, using OC-MBs group and SonoVue®, the r-values of the weighted PI and perfusion ratio were 0.8685 and 0.5643, respectively, while that of 2D-CEUS condition were 0.7760 and 0.3513, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vitro experiments showed that OC-MBs have the potential in acquiring more stable quantitative CEUS value, as compared to the SonoVue® in 3D-CEUS condition. The combination of 3D-CEUS and OC-MBs can reflect perfusion volume more precisely and may be a potential way to reduce quantitative heterogeneity.

摘要

背景

肿瘤内的异质性可能导致定量灌注参数的较大异质性。三维对比增强超声(3D-CEUS)可以在采集后重建中显示血管结构的空间关系,并且单分散微泡可以使超声脉冲共振,从而提高 CEUS 成像的灵敏度。

目的

评估 3D-CEUS 与单分散微泡结合是否可以降低定量 CEUS 的异质性。

材料和方法

建立了灌注体积比为 1:2:4 的三个体外灌注模型。使用两种超声造影剂(一种是本研究中制备的新型单分散微泡,命名为八氟丙烷负载 cerasomal 微泡(OC-MBs),另一种是 SonoVue®)分别进行定量 2D-CEUS 和 3D-CEUS 采集,计算峰值强度(PI)。使用变异系数(CV)评估横断面上的变异性。采用 Pearson 相关分析评估加权 PI(三个不同平面的 PI 平均值)与灌注比之间的相关性。

结果

定量 3D-CEUS 的平均 CV 略低于定量 2D-CEUS(0.41±0.17 与 0.55±0.26,p=0.3592)。对于定量 3D-CEUS,OC-MBs 的 PI 稳定性优于 SonoVue®,但无显著差异(平均 CVs:0.32±0.19 与 0.50±0.10,p=0.0711)。在 2D-CEUS 条件下,OC-MBs 组和 SonoVue®组的平均 CV 分别为 0.68±0.15 和 0.41±0.17(p=0.2747)。对于 3D-CEUS 条件,使用 OC-MBs 组和 SonoVue®,加权 PI 和灌注比的 r 值分别为 0.8685 和 0.5643,而 2D-CEUS 条件的 r 值分别为 0.7760 和 0.3513。

结论

我们的体外实验表明,与 SonoVue®相比,OC-MBs 在 3D-CEUS 条件下具有获取更稳定定量 CEUS 值的潜力。3D-CEUS 与 OC-MBs 的结合可以更准确地反映灌注量,可能是降低定量异质性的一种潜在方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验