Superintendência da Polícia Técnico Científica do Estado de São Paulo SPTC, SP, Brazil.
Superintendência da Polícia Técnico Científica do Estado de São Paulo SPTC, SP, Brazil.
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Jan;330:111100. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111100. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
This work evaluated the accuracy of 3D models generated by a DJI Mavic Pro drone with 3DF Zephyr software photogrammetry. The models were compared to models generated by a Trimble X7 laser scanner. The tests were performed in the outdoor area of a vehicle parking inbound to simulate the characteristics of a crime scene. Ground control points (GCPs) were distributed in ten positions within the surroundings. In manual flight, the drone performed nadiral photographs from one side to the other side and with an elliptical 45° center pointed. Three altitudes where tested: 10 m, 20 m and 40 m. The Trimble X7 laser scanner performed six scans and generated one set of point clouds. Drone photogrammetry returned eligible data for distances of 20 m and 40 m with errors of ~0.25 mm. To increase the overlay in the photogrammetry procedure, all photographs from distances of 10-40 m were processed, returning an error of ~0.53 mm. The results of the measured distances, which were manually picked from the GCPs, from the 3D-scanned model and photogrammetric 3D models were then statistically analyzed. The Trimble X7 laser scanner showed an average error of 3 cm, which was approximately equivalent to the results obtained with all images or when using a known scale value for the drone photographs, presenting no significant differences among the evaluated methods.
这项工作评估了 DJI Mavic Pro 无人机与 3DF Zephyr 软件摄影测量生成的 3D 模型的准确性。将这些模型与 Trimble X7 激光扫描仪生成的模型进行了比较。测试是在车辆入站停车场的户外区域进行的,以模拟犯罪现场的特征。在周围环境中分布了十个位置的地面控制点 (GCP)。在手动飞行中,无人机从一侧到另一侧进行 nadiral 摄影,并且以 45°的椭圆中心点指向。测试了三个高度:10 米、20 米和 40 米。Trimble X7 激光扫描仪进行了六次扫描并生成了一组点云。无人机摄影测量返回的 20 米和 40 米距离的数据合格,误差约为 0.25 毫米。为了增加摄影测量过程中的重叠,处理了来自 10-40 米的所有照片,返回的误差约为 0.53 毫米。然后对从 GCP 手动选择的测量距离、从 3D 扫描模型和摄影测量 3D 模型的结果进行了统计分析。Trimble X7 激光扫描仪的平均误差为 3 厘米,这与使用所有图像或使用无人机照片的已知比例值获得的结果大致相当,所评估的方法之间没有显著差异。