Capellari Renato S, Santos Charles Morphy D
Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Universidade de São Paulo, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do ABC, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Rua Santa Adélia 166, Bairro Bangu, 09210-170, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Cladistics. 2012 Apr;28(2):170-173. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00363.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
There is an overlooked gap between any phylogenetic hypothesis and the natural world shaped by historical evolutionary processes, since the main concern during phylogenetic analyses is solely the search for congruence among characters under a defined criterion. Given a scientific realistic view, however, phylogenetic hypotheses are scientific theories that try to depict the historical series of cladogenetic events among biological entities. In this sense, the challenge is to establish a form of measuring the degree of truthfulness of our phylogenetic hypotheses. Here, we advocate the use of consilient biogeographical hypotheses to recognize the biological meaning of a phylogenetic inference apart from its instrumentalist value. Our proposal is based on the assumption that robust biogeographical hypotheses allows us to be close to the real evolutionary history of taxa. © The Willi Hennig Society 2011.
在任何系统发育假说与由历史进化过程塑造的自然世界之间,存在着一个被忽视的差距,因为在系统发育分析过程中,主要关注的仅仅是在既定标准下寻找性状之间的一致性。然而,从科学现实主义的观点来看,系统发育假说是试图描绘生物实体间分支发生事件历史序列的科学理论。从这个意义上说,挑战在于建立一种衡量我们系统发育假说真实性程度的形式。在此,我们提倡使用一致性生物地理学假说,以认识到系统发育推断的生物学意义,而不仅仅是其工具主义价值。我们的提议基于这样一个假设,即强有力的生物地理学假说能让我们更接近分类群的真实进化历史。© 威利·亨尼希学会 2011 年。