• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于中国贵州省数据采用倾向评分匹配对照的差分法设计,评估总额预付制结合按绩效付费对县级医院医疗质量的影响。

Impact of global budget combined with pay-for-performance on the quality of care in county hospitals: a difference-in-differences study design with a propaensity-score-matched control group using data from Guizhou province, China.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

West China Research Center for Rural Health Development, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 2;21(1):1296. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07338-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07338-8
PMID:34856985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8641159/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Provider payment system has a profound impact on health system performance. In 2016, a number of counties in rural Guizhou, China, implemented global budget (GB) for county hospitals with quality control measures. The aim of this study is to measure the impact of GB combined with pay-for-performance on the quality of care of inpatients in county-level hospitals in China.

METHODS

Inpatient cases of four diseases, including pneumonia, chronic asthma, acute myocardial infarction and stroke, from 16 county-level hospitals in Guizhou province that implemented GB in 2016 were selected as the intervention group, and similar inpatient cases from 10 county-level hospitals that still implemented fee-for-services were used as the control group. Propensity matching score (PSM) was used for data matching to control for age factors, and difference-in-differences (DID) models were constructed using the matched samples to perform regression analysis on quality of care for the four diseases.

RESULTS

After the implementation of GB, rate of sputum culture in patients with pneumonia, rate of aspirin at discharge, rate of discharge with β-blocker and rate of smoking cessation advice in patients with acute myocardial infarction increased. Rate of oxygenation index assessment in patient with chronic asthma decreased 20.3%. There are no significant changes in other indicators of process quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of pay-for-performance in the global budget payment system will help to reduce the quality risks associated with the reform of the payment system and improve the quality of care. Future reform should also consider the inclusion of the pay-for-performance mechanism.

摘要

背景

支付制度对卫生系统绩效具有深远影响。2016 年,中国贵州省部分农村地区的县级医院实施了包含质量控制措施的总额预算制(GB)。本研究旨在衡量 GB 与按绩效付费相结合对中国县级医院住院患者医疗质量的影响。

方法

从贵州省 2016 年实施 GB 的 16 所县级医院中选取了肺炎、慢性哮喘、急性心肌梗死和脑卒中这 4 种疾病的住院病例作为干预组,选取了仍采用按服务项目付费的 10 所县级医院的类似住院病例作为对照组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)对数据进行匹配,以控制年龄因素,并使用匹配样本构建差值-差异(DID)模型,对这 4 种疾病的医疗质量进行回归分析。

结果

GB 实施后,肺炎患者痰培养率、急性心肌梗死患者出院时阿司匹林使用率、出院时β受体阻滞剂使用率、急性心肌梗死患者戒烟建议率均有所提高。慢性哮喘患者的氧合指数评估率下降了 20.3%。其他过程质量指标没有明显变化。

结论

将按绩效付费纳入总额预算支付体系有助于降低支付制度改革带来的质量风险,提高医疗质量。未来的改革还应考虑纳入按绩效付费机制。

相似文献

1
Impact of global budget combined with pay-for-performance on the quality of care in county hospitals: a difference-in-differences study design with a propaensity-score-matched control group using data from Guizhou province, China.基于中国贵州省数据采用倾向评分匹配对照的差分法设计,评估总额预付制结合按绩效付费对县级医院医疗质量的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 2;21(1):1296. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07338-8.
2
Is There a Difference in the Utilisation of Inpatient Services Between Two Typical Payment Methods of Health Insurance? Evidence from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China.两种典型医疗保险支付方式下的住院服务利用是否存在差异?来自中国新型农村合作医疗制度的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 19;16(8):1410. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081410.
3
Can a global budget improve health care efficiency? Experimental evidence from China.全球预算能否提高医疗保健效率?来自中国的实验证据。
Health Econ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1676-1694. doi: 10.1002/hec.4531. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的绩效薪酬、医疗质量与治疗结果
JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2373-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.21.2373.
5
Effectiveness evaluation of quota payment for specific diseases under global budget: a typical provider payment system reform in rural China.全球预算下特定疾病定额支付的效果评估:中国农村地区典型的供方支付制度改革
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3415-0.
6
Realigning the provider payment system for primary health care: a pilot study in a rural county of Zhejiang Province, China.调整基层医疗服务提供者支付体系:中国浙江省某农村县的试点研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Oct 9;21:e43. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000444.
7
The effects of global budget on cost control and readmission in rural China: a difference-in-difference analysis.全球预算对中国农村地区成本控制和再入院率的影响:一项双重差分分析
J Med Econ. 2017 Sep;20(9):903-910. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1336448. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Improving the performance of social health insurance system through increasing outpatient expenditure reimbursement ratio: a quasi-experimental evaluation study from rural China.通过提高门诊支出报销比例来提高社会医疗保险制度绩效:来自中国农村的准实验评估研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 25;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0799-8.
9
Impacts of health insurance benefit design on percutaneous coronary intervention use and inpatient costs among patients with acute myocardial infarction in Shanghai, China.中国上海医疗保险福利设计对急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的使用及住院费用的影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Mar;32(3):265-75. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0079-9.
10
Quality of care in large Chinese hospitals: an observational study.大型中国医院的医疗质量:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):963-970. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008938. Epub 2019 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of workload among medical records coders in China.中国病案编码员工作负荷的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02750-6.
2
The impacts of diagnosis-intervention packet payment on the providers' behavior of inpatient care-evidence from a national pilot city in China.诊断-干预包支付对住院医疗服务提供者行为的影响——来自中国国家试点城市的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;11:1069131. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069131. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of two disparate policies on child health: experimental evidence from the Philippines.两项不同政策对儿童健康的比较效果:来自菲律宾的实验证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 May 1;32(4):563-571. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw179.
2
Investing in health: the 1993 World Development Report of the World Bank.投资于健康:世界银行《1993年世界发展报告》
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1993;27(3):284-6.