Suppr超能文献

通过提高门诊支出报销比例来提高社会医疗保险制度绩效:来自中国农村的准实验评估研究。

Improving the performance of social health insurance system through increasing outpatient expenditure reimbursement ratio: a quasi-experimental evaluation study from rural China.

机构信息

Henan Provincial People's Hospital, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan Province, China.

School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 25;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0799-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

China has set up a universal coverage social health insurance system since the 2009 healthcare reform. Due to the inadequate funds, the social health insurance system reimbursed the inpatient expenditures with much higher ratio than outpatient expenditure. The gap in reimbursement ratios resulted in a rapid rising hospitalization rate but poor health outcomes among the Chinese population. A redistribution of social health insurance funds has become one of the main challenges for the performance of Social Health Insurance.

METHODS

Two comparable counties, Dangyang County and Zhijiang County, in Hubei Province of China, were sampled as the intervention group and the control group, respectively. The Social Health Insurance Management Department of the intervention group budgeted 600 yuan per capita per year to the patients with 3rd stage hypertension to cover their outpatient expenditures. The outpatient spending in the control group were paid out-of-pocket. The inpatient expenditures reimbursement policies in both groups were not changed. Besides, the Social Health Insurance Management Department of the intervention group budgeted 100 yuan per patient per year to township physicians and hospitals to provide health management services for the patients. While, the health management services in the control group were still provided by health workers. A Propensity Score Matching model and Difference-in-differences model were used to estimate the net effects of the intervention in dimensions of medical services utilization, medical expenditures, SHI reimbursement, and health outcomes.

RESULTS

One thousand, six hundred and seventy three pairs of patients were taken as valid subjects to conduct Difference-in-differences estimation after the Propensity Score Matching. The net intervention effect is to increase outpatient frequency by 3.3 (81.0%) times (P < 0.05), to decrease hospitalization frequency by 0.075 (- 60.0%) times (P < 0.05), and to increase the per capita total medical service utilization frequency by 3.225 (76.8%) times (P < 0.05). The per capita total medical expenditure decreased 394.2 (- 27.7%) yuan. The SHI reimbursed 90.3 yuan more per capita for the outpatient spending, but the per capita inpatient expenditure reimbursement and per capita total medical expenditure reimbursement decreased significantly by 282.6 (- 44.0%) yuan and 192.3 (- 28.5%) yuan, respectively (P < 0.05). The intervention reduced the per capita inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure and the per capita total out-of-pocket expenditure by 192.8 (- 36.7%) yuan and 201.9 (- 29.9%) yuan, respectively (P < 0.05). The intervention significantly decreased the diastolic blood pressure of the intervention group by 2.9 mmHg (P < 0.05) but had no significant impact on the systolic blood pressure (- 7.9 mmHg, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For China and countries attempting to establish a universal coverage SHI with inadequate funds, inpatient services were expensive but might not produce good health outcomes. Outpatient care for patients with chronic diseases should be fundamental, and outpatient expenditures should be reimbursed with a higher ratio.

摘要

背景

自 2009 年医疗改革以来,中国建立了全民覆盖的社会医疗保险制度。由于资金不足,社会医疗保险对住院支出的报销比例远高于门诊支出。报销比例的差距导致住院率迅速上升,但中国人口的健康状况却没有改善。社会医疗保险资金的再分配已成为社会医疗保险绩效的主要挑战之一。

方法

在中国湖北省的两个可比县,当阳市和枝江市,分别作为干预组和对照组进行抽样。干预组的社会医疗保险管理部门为 3 期高血压患者每人每年预算 600 元,用于支付其门诊费用。对照组的门诊费用由患者自付。两组的住院费用报销政策均未改变。此外,干预组的社会医疗保险管理部门为乡镇医生和医院的每位患者每年预算 100 元,用于为患者提供健康管理服务。而对照组的健康管理服务仍由卫生工作者提供。采用倾向评分匹配模型和差分法模型来估计干预在医疗服务利用、医疗支出、社会医疗保险报销和健康结果方面的净效应。

结果

经过倾向评分匹配后,有 1673 对患者被纳入差异分析。干预的净效果是使门诊就诊频率增加 3.3 倍(81.0%)(P<0.05),住院就诊频率减少 0.075 次(-60.0%)(P<0.05),人均总医疗服务利用频率增加 3.225 次(76.8%)(P<0.05)。人均总医疗支出减少 394.2 元(-27.7%)。社会医疗保险为门诊支出报销增加了 90.3 元,但人均住院支出报销和人均总医疗支出报销分别显著减少了 282.6 元(-44.0%)和 192.3 元(-28.5%)(P<0.05)。该干预措施使人均住院自费支出和人均总自费支出分别减少了 192.8 元(-36.7%)和 201.9 元(-29.9%)(P<0.05)。该干预措施显著降低了干预组的舒张压 2.9 毫米汞柱(P<0.05),但对收缩压没有显著影响(-7.9 毫米汞柱,P>0.05)。

结论

对于中国和其他试图建立资金不足的全民覆盖社会医疗保险的国家来说,住院服务昂贵,但可能不会产生良好的健康结果。慢性病患者的门诊治疗应作为基础,门诊支出应按更高的比例报销。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04c3/6019724/104f8f42d067/12939_2018_799_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验