Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59, Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Dec 2;10(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-01035-1.
We sought to determine the minimum number of observations needed to determine hand hygiene (HH) compliance among healthcare workers. The study was conducted at a referral hospital in South Korea. We retrospectively analyzed the result of HH monitoring from January to December 2018. HH compliance was calculated by dividing the number of observed HH actions by the total number of opportunities. Optimal HH compliance rates were calculated based on adherence to the six-step technique recommended by the World Health Organization. The minimum number of required observations (n) was calculated by the following equation using overall mean value (ρ), absolute precision (d), and confidence interval (CI) (1 - α) [the equation: [Formula: see text]]. We considered ds of 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30%, with CIs of 99%, 95%, and 90%. During the study period, 8791 HH opportunities among 1168 healthcare workers were monitored. Mean HH compliance and optimal HH compliance rates were 80.3% and 59.7%, respectively. The minimum number of observations required to determine HH compliance rates ranged from 2 ([Formula: see text]: 30%, CI: 90%) to 624 ([Formula: see text]: 5%, CI: 99%), and that for optimal HH compliance ranged from 5 ([Formula: see text]: 30%, CI: 90%) to 642 ([Formula: see text]: 5%, CI: 99%). Therefore, we found that our hospital required at least five observations to determine optimal HH compliance.
我们旨在确定确定医护人员手卫生(HH)依从性所需的最少观察次数。该研究在韩国的一家转诊医院进行。我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 12 月的 HH 监测结果。HH 依从性通过将观察到的 HH 动作次数除以总机会数来计算。根据世界卫生组织推荐的六步技术来计算最佳 HH 依从率。使用总体平均值(ρ)、绝对精度(d)和置信区间(CI)(1-α)[公式:见文本],通过以下方程计算所需的最小观察次数(n)。我们考虑了 ds 为 5%、10%、20%和 30%,置信区间为 99%、95%和 90%。在研究期间,监测了 1168 名医护人员中的 8791 次 HH 机会。平均 HH 依从率和最佳 HH 依从率分别为 80.3%和 59.7%。确定 HH 依从率所需的最小观察次数范围从 2([公式:见文本]:30%,CI:90%)到 624([公式:见文本]:5%,CI:99%),最佳 HH 依从率的最小观察次数范围从 5([公式:见文本]:30%,CI:90%)到 642([公式:见文本]:5%,CI:99%)。因此,我们发现我们的医院至少需要进行五次观察才能确定最佳 HH 依从率。