AbbVie Inc., DMPK-BA, North Chicago, Illinois.
AbbVie Inc., DMPK-BA, North Chicago, Illinois
Drug Metab Dispos. 2022 Feb;50(2):105-113. doi: 10.1124/dmd.121.000638. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Screening for cytochrome P450 (CYP) induction potential is routine in drug development. Induction results in a net increase in CYP protein and is assessed typically by measuring indirect endpoints, i.e., enzyme activity and mRNA in vitro. Recent methodological advancements have made CYP protein quantification by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in vitro induction studies more accessible and amenable to routine testing. In this study, we evaluated CYP3A4 concentration dependence of induction response for 11 compounds (rifampin, rifabutin, carbamazepine, efavirenz, nitrendipine, flumazenil, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, troglitazone, pazopanib, and ticagrelor) in plated hepatocytes from two or three donors incorporating in the assessment all three endpoints. In addition, the time-dependence of the induction was examined over 1, 2, or 3 days of treatment. For most compounds, mRNA, enzyme activity, and protein endpoints exhibited similarity in induction responses. Pazopanib and ticagrelor were notable exceptions as neither protein nor enzyme activity were induced despite mRNA induction of a magnitude similar to efavirenz, pioglitazone, or rosiglitazone, which clearly induced in all three endpoints. Static modeling of clinical induction responses supported a role for protein as a predictive endpoint. These data highlight the value of including CYP protein quantification as an induction assay endpoint to provide a more comprehensive assessment of induction liability. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Direct, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based quantification of cytochrome P450 (CYP) protein is a desirable induction assay endpoint; however such application has been limited due to inefficient workflows. Here, we incorporate recent advancements in protein quantitation methods to efficiently quantify CYP3A4 protein in in vitro induction assays with 11 compounds in up to 3 donors. The data indicate induction responses from mRNA do not always align with those of protein suggesting assessment of induction liability is more complex than thought previously.
在药物开发中,筛选细胞色素 P450(CYP)诱导潜力是常规操作。诱导会导致 CYP 蛋白的净增加,通常通过测量间接终点来评估,即体外的酶活性和 mRNA。最近的方法学进展使得通过液相色谱-质谱法(LC-MS)在体外诱导研究中更方便地定量 CYP 蛋白,并使其更适合常规测试。在这项研究中,我们评估了 11 种化合物(利福平、利福布汀、卡马西平、依非韦伦、尼群地平、氟马西尼、吡格列酮、罗格列酮、曲格列酮、帕唑帕尼和替格瑞洛)在来自两个或三个供体的培养肝细胞中的 CYP3A4 浓度依赖性诱导反应,其中纳入了所有三个终点的评估。此外,还研究了诱导过程在 1、2 或 3 天治疗期间的时间依赖性。对于大多数化合物,mRNA、酶活性和蛋白终点在诱导反应中表现出相似性。然而,帕唑帕尼和替格瑞洛是明显的例外,尽管它们的 mRNA 诱导程度与依非韦伦、吡格列酮或罗格列酮相似,但它们既没有诱导蛋白也没有诱导酶活性,而这两种化合物在所有三个终点中都明显诱导。临床诱导反应的静态模型支持将蛋白作为预测终点。这些数据突出了将 CYP 蛋白定量作为诱导测定终点的重要性,以提供对诱导性的更全面评估。
直接的基于液相色谱-质谱法(LC-MS)的细胞色素 P450(CYP)蛋白定量是一种理想的诱导测定终点;然而,由于工作流程效率低下,这种应用受到限制。在这里,我们将最近的蛋白定量方法的进展纳入到了 11 种化合物在多达 3 个供体的体外诱导测定中,以高效定量 CYP3A4 蛋白。数据表明,mRNA 的诱导反应并不总是与蛋白的诱导反应一致,这表明对诱导性的评估比以前认为的要复杂。