Cheruvu Ved Prakash Rao, Gaba Sunil, John Jerry R, Rawat Sourabh
Department of Plastic Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh 160012, India.
Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Oct 15;11(5):365-376. eCollection 2021.
Metacarpal fractures are common injuries and comprise nearly 36% to 42% of all fractures in the hand. The majority of these can be managed non-surgically. Operative fixation when needed, can be done by a variety of techniques. In this study, we have compared the outcomes of two techniques, plate-screw fixation and K-wire fixation. We have conducted a prospective, non-randomized, comparative study of patients who presented with extra-articular metacarpal shaft fractures of non-thumb metacarpals over a period of 18 months. 30 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria and were alternately allotted to the plate-screw group and the K-wire group. At admission, patient demographics, clinical features, number of fractures, and fracture patterns were recorded, and radiographs were taken. In the plate-screw group, low-profile plates and screws were used, and in the K-wire group, 1 or 2 K-wires were used for fixation after fracture reduction. Hand mobilization exercises were started within one week in the plate-screw group, while in the K-wire group full mobilization was allowed at 4 weeks post-surgery. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was calculated and compared between the two groups at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The mean 6-month DASH score in the plate-screw group was 6.3287±2.2453, while it was 17.1627±6.2103 in the K-wire group ( value <0.001). At the end of 1-year follow-up, the mean DASH score in the plate-screw group was 5.1080±1.6637, and in the K-wire group, it was 5.1073±1.9392 ( value =0.848). In conclusion, extra-articular metacarpal shaft fractures of the non-thumb metacarpals treated by plate-screw fixation had significantly better DASH scores and hence better functional outcomes at the end of 6 months. However, at the end of 1 year, the DASH scores in both the groups were almost similar, suggesting similar functional outcomes in the long term.
掌骨骨折是常见的损伤,占手部所有骨折的近36%至42%。其中大多数可以通过非手术方法治疗。必要时可采用多种技术进行手术固定。在本研究中,我们比较了钢板螺钉固定和克氏针固定两种技术的疗效。我们对18个月内出现非拇指掌骨的关节外掌骨干骨折的患者进行了一项前瞻性、非随机、对照研究。根据纳入标准招募了30名患者,并将他们交替分配到钢板螺钉组和克氏针组。入院时,记录患者的人口统计学信息、临床特征、骨折数量和骨折类型,并拍摄X光片。在钢板螺钉组中,使用了低轮廓钢板和螺钉,在克氏针组中,骨折复位后使用1根或2根克氏针进行固定。钢板螺钉组在1周内开始手部活动练习,而克氏针组在术后4周允许完全活动。计算并比较两组在术后6个月和12个月时的手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。钢板螺钉组6个月时的平均DASH评分为6.3287±2.2453,而克氏针组为17.1627±6.2103(P值<0.001)。在1年随访结束时,钢板螺钉组的平均DASH评分为5.1080±1.6637,克氏针组为5.1073±1.9392(P值=0.848)。总之,采用钢板螺钉固定治疗非拇指掌骨的关节外掌骨干骨折,在6个月末时DASH评分明显更好,因此功能结局更好。然而,在1年末时,两组的DASH评分几乎相似,表明长期功能结局相似。