• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical application of integrated angulated screw channel abutment crown in implant-supported rehabilitation of aesthetic area.一体化成角螺丝通道基台冠在美学区种植修复中的临床应用
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 1;39(6):712-717. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.014.
2
Comparative evaluation of biological, mechanical, and patient-reported outcomes of angulated screw channel abutments versus multi-unit abutment-retained single-unit implant restorations in the anterior esthetic zone: An- study.角度螺钉通道基台与多单位基台固位单单位种植体修复体在前牙美学区的生物学、机械学和患者报告结局的比较评价:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):244-252. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_101_23.
3
Frequency of screw-retained angulated screw channel single crown following immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: A cone beam computed tomography study.在美学区域内,即刻种植和临时修复后,带角度螺丝通道单冠螺钉固位的频率:锥形束 CT 研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Oct;25(5):789-794. doi: 10.1111/cid.13227. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
[Comparison of clinical esthetic effects of two abutments of maxillary anterior dental implants with single crown].[上颌前牙单冠种植两种基台的临床美学效果比较]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 9;59(6):571-577. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240219-00078.
5
Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment.单颗牙种植体即刻植入并使用定制个性化基台进行临时修复后的患者满意度及美学效果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Nov;25(11):1245-1250. doi: 10.1111/clr.12260. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
6
A prospective study on single tooth reconstructions using parallel walled implants with internal connection (NobelParallel CC) and abutments with angulated screw channels (ASC).一项关于使用具有内部连接(NobelParallel CC)的平行壁种植体和带有角度螺丝通道(ASC)的基台的单牙重建的前瞻性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Apr;21(2):226-231. doi: 10.1111/cid.12709. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
[Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].[后牙单颗种植体支持修复体5年随访疗效的临床观察]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):970-976. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.027.
8
Clinical, radiographic, and immunological evaluation of angulated screw-retained and cemented single-implant crowns in the esthetic region: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.临床、影像学和免疫学评估在美学区域中使用角度螺丝固位和粘结单牙种植体冠:一项为期 1 年的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):692-702. doi: 10.1111/cid.13035. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
9
Angulated screw-retained and cemented implant crowns following flapless immediate implant placement in the aesthetic region: A 1-year prospective cohort study.无瓣即刻种植术中使用角度螺钉固位和粘结固位的种植体冠:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13(3):269-277.
10
Clinical effect of Nobel Biocare angulated screw channel crown compared with cement crown in the aesthetic area: A retrospective cohort study with a mean 32 months follow-up (range 12 to 70 months).诺贝尔生物活性公司有角度螺钉通道冠与美学区域黏结冠的临床效果比较:一项平均随访32个月(范围12至70个月)的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Dec;25(6):1178-1186. doi: 10.1111/cid.13264. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Angled Screw Channel-Retained vs. Cement-Retained Implant Crowns in Nonmolar Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非磨牙区角度螺丝通道固位与水泥固位种植体冠的系统评价和Meta分析
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jul;37(7):1706-1720. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13463. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Comparative evaluation of biological, mechanical, and patient-reported outcomes of angulated screw channel abutments versus multi-unit abutment-retained single-unit implant restorations in the anterior esthetic zone: An- study.角度螺钉通道基台与多单位基台固位单单位种植体修复体在前牙美学区的生物学、机械学和患者报告结局的比较评价:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):244-252. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_101_23.

本文引用的文献

1
Esthetic abutment design for angulated screw channels: A technical report.角度螺丝通道的美学基台设计:技术报告。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jun;119(6):912-915. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
2
Mechanical Complications Associated with Angled Screw Channel Restorations.与角状螺钉通道修复相关的机械并发症
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 May/Jun;30(3):258-259. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5150.
3
Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.螺钉固位与粘结固位的种植体支持固定义齿修复。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):141-151. doi: 10.1111/prd.12168.
4
Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: a clinical report.一种避免面部入路孔的螺丝固位修复体的制作:病例报告
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):621-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications.螺钉固位与水泥固位种植体修复体:口腔修复维护与并发症的系统评价
Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):127-45. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3947.
6
Dynamic Abutment: A method of redirecting screw access for implant-supported restorations: Technical details and a clinical report.动态基台:一种用于种植体支持修复体的螺钉通道重新定位方法:技术细节与临床报告。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):516-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.009. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
Influence of prosthesis type and retention mechanism on complications with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review applying multivariate analyses.假体类型和固位机制对固定种植支持式假体并发症的影响:一项应用多变量分析的系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):110-24. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3607.
8
Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis.倾斜式与轴向植入牙种植体:一项荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):149-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants.在比较使用聚醚印模材料的模拟种植体印模与种植牙数字化印模(口内扫描)时患者的偏好。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Oct;25(10):1113-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12234. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates.黏结和螺钉固位种植体修复:对生存率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:163-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x.

一体化成角螺丝通道基台冠在美学区种植修复中的临床应用

Clinical application of integrated angulated screw channel abutment crown in implant-supported rehabilitation of aesthetic area.

作者信息

Wang Yan Mei, Liu Xin, He Jia Cai

机构信息

Dept. of Oral Implantology, College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, Hefei 230032, China.

出版信息

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 1;39(6):712-717. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.014.

DOI:10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.014
PMID:34859633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8703099/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effect of integrated angulated screw channel (ASC) abutment crown in implant-supported rehabilitation of the aesthetic area.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who received single implant-supported rehabilitation using integrated ASC abutment crown in the aesthetic area were included in the study. After one-year follow-up, the cumulative survival rate, aesthetic effectiveness, bone resorption around implants, and patient satisfaction were analyzed through periapical film, clinical examination, and the visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The implant cumulative survival rate of the integrated ASC abutment crown in the implant-supported rehabilitation of the aesthetic area was 100%. The average pink esthetic index scores reached 9.5, and the white esthetic index scores reached 9.4. The mean marginal bone loss of implants was (0.439±0.123) mm at the mesial side and (0.341±0.118) mm at the distal side. The average VAS satisfaction score was 8.9, which showed that all patients were satisfied with the final restorative effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Using integrated ASC abutment crown for implant restoration is an ideal implant restoration design in the aesthetic zone and can be applied clinically.

摘要

目的

评估一体化成角螺丝通道(ASC)基台冠在美学区种植修复中的临床效果。

方法

本研究纳入16例在美学区采用一体化ASC基台冠进行单颗种植修复的患者。经过1年的随访,通过根尖片、临床检查及视觉模拟量表(VAS)分析种植体的累计存留率、美学效果、种植体周围骨吸收情况及患者满意度。

结果

一体化ASC基台冠在美学区种植修复中的种植体累计存留率为100%。粉色美学指数平均得分达9.5分,白色美学指数平均得分达9.4分。种植体近中侧平均边缘骨吸收量为(0.439±0.123)mm,远中侧为(0.341±0.118)mm。VAS满意度平均得分为8.9分,表明所有患者对最终修复效果均满意。

结论

采用一体化ASC基台冠进行种植修复是美学区理想的种植修复设计,可应用于临床。