Steveling Esther H, Winzeler Bettina, Bircher Andreas J
University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Pharm Technol. 2014 Oct;30(5):182-186. doi: 10.1177/8755122514539462. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
To report a case of systemic hypersensitivity to the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide used in diabetes care to provide significant information within the context of postmarketing safety surveillance of this new drug class. We report on a 52-year-old male with insufficiently controlled diabetes. GLP-1 agonist treatment was indicated and the patient was started on 5 to 10 µg exenatide (Byetta) twice daily, which had to be stopped after 1 month due to intolerable nausea. One year later, an attempt with 0.6 to 1.8 mg liraglutide (Victoza) once daily was well tolerated but lacked efficacy after a few months. Finally, the patient was started on 2 mg exenatide (Bydureon) once weekly. Concomitant treatment included metformine 1000 mg twice daily and candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Blopress Plus) 16/12.5 mg once daily. A few hours after the second injection, local urticaria and disseminated pruritus evolved and after the third injection pruritus, urticaria, and shortness of breath developed, which resolved to antihistamines and corticosteroids. Intradermal tests were positive for Byetta (1:1000) and Bydureon (1:100) (both exenatide), while Victoza (liraglutide) was negative (1:10). Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to the drugs was not available for testing. An objective causality assessment revealed that the adverse effect to exenatide (Bydureon) was probable (Naranjo probability scale: score of 8). Consistency was established through positive skin tests and the biological explanation that the administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists has been associated with antibody formation. Considering emerging use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, systemic hypersensitivity should be recognized as a risk in clinical practice.
报告一例在糖尿病治疗中使用胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂艾塞那肽出现全身超敏反应的病例,以便在这一新型药物的上市后安全性监测背景下提供重要信息。我们报告一名52岁男性糖尿病患者,血糖控制不佳。鉴于需要使用GLP-1激动剂进行治疗,遂让该患者开始每日两次注射5至10微克艾塞那肽(百泌达),但1个月后因无法耐受的恶心而停药。1年后,尝试每日一次注射0.6至1.8毫克利拉鲁肽(维达列汀),患者耐受性良好,但几个月后疗效不佳。最后,让该患者开始每周一次注射2毫克艾塞那肽(百达扬)。同时进行的治疗包括每日两次服用1000毫克二甲双胍以及每日一次服用16/12.5毫克坎地沙坦/氢氯噻嗪(复代文)。第二次注射后数小时,出现局部荨麻疹和弥漫性瘙痒,第三次注射后出现瘙痒、荨麻疹和呼吸急促,使用抗组胺药和皮质类固醇后症状缓解。皮内试验显示,百泌达(1:1000)和百达扬(1:100)(均为艾塞那肽)呈阳性,而维达列汀(利拉鲁肽)呈阴性(1:10)。无法检测针对这些药物的特异性免疫球蛋白E(IgE)。客观因果关系评估显示,对艾塞那肽(百达扬)的不良反应很可能发生(纳朗霍概率量表:评分8分)。通过阳性皮肤试验以及GLP-1受体激动剂给药与抗体形成相关的生物学解释确定了一致性。考虑到GLP-1受体激动剂的新用途,在临床实践中应认识到全身超敏反应是一种风险。