Zhang Xinqiao, Li Wen, Zhao Na, Jin Yu, Cheung Teris, Ungvari Gabor S, Cui Xi-Ling, Wang Gang, Xiang Yu-Tao, Angst Jules
The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital and the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, School of Mental Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Key Laboratory of Forensic Science, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 15;12:727992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.727992. eCollection 2021.
The misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) as major depressive disorder (MDD) is common in depressed older adults. The self-rated HCL-33 and its external assessment version (HCL-33-EA) have been developed to screen for hypomanic symptoms. This study compared the screening ability of these two instruments to discriminate BD from MDD. A total of 215 patients (107 with BD and 108 with MDD) and their carers were recruited. Patients and their carers completed the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA, respectively. The consistency of the total score and the positive response to each item between the two scales was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient separately. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn for both instruments. The optimal cut-off points were determined according to the maximum Youden's Index. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA were calculated separately and compared. The sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off values were also calculated separately for the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the total scores of the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA was 0.823 (95% CI = 0.774-0.862). The positive response rate on all items showed high agreement between the two instruments. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the total scores of both HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA differentiated well between MDD and BD, while there was no significant difference in the AUCs between the two scales (Z = 0.422, = 0.673). The optimal cutoff values for the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA were 14 and 12, respectively. With the optimal cutoff value, the sensitivities of the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA were 88.8% and 93.5%, and their specificities were 82.4% and 79.6%. Both the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA had good screening ability for discriminating BD from MDD in depressed older adults.
双相情感障碍(BD)被误诊为重度抑郁症(MDD)在老年抑郁症患者中很常见。自评的HCL - 33及其外部评估版本(HCL - 33 - EA)已被开发用于筛查轻躁狂症状。本研究比较了这两种工具区分BD和MDD的筛查能力。共招募了215名患者(107名BD患者和108名MDD患者)及其照料者。患者及其照料者分别完成了HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA。分别用组内相关系数(ICC)和科恩kappa系数计算两个量表总分及各项目阳性反应的一致性。为两种工具绘制了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。根据最大约登指数确定最佳截断点。分别计算并比较HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。还分别计算了HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA在最佳截断值时的敏感性和特异性。HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA总分之间的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.823(95%CI = 0.774 - 0.862)。两种工具在所有项目上的阳性反应率显示出高度一致性。ROC曲线分析表明,HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA的总分在MDD和BD之间有良好区分度,而两个量表的AUC之间无显著差异(Z = 0.422,P = 0.673)。HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA的最佳截断值分别为14和12。在最佳截断值时,HCL - 33和HCL - 33 - EA的敏感性分别为88.8%和9