Hou Xiaoxue, Li Yuwen, Yuan Hui, Cai Jinyuan, Liu Rui, Li Jun, Zhu Chuanlong
Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 16;8:784240. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.784240. eCollection 2021.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been proposed as a therapeutic option for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). However, its clinical efficacy remains debatable. This study aimed to synthesize available evidence on the efficacy of G-CSF in ALCF. The Cochrane Library, CNKI, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until September 2021. After qualitative evaluation of the included literature, the included studies were analyzed. Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, G-CSF therapy was not associated with a reduced risk of death (30-day survival, OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.38, = 0.05; 60-day survival, OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.36, = 0.08; 90-day survival, OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.99, 2.62, = 0.05) or complication including occurrence of infections infection (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.05, = 0.08), bleeding (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 0.58, 3.89, = 0.41), and hepatorenal syndrome (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.24, = 0.15). Moreover, it had no obvious beneficial effects on the model of end-stage liver disease score (30-day SMD = -3.31, 95%CI: -7.42, 0.81, = 0.12; 60-day SMD = -1.23, 95% CI: -5.21, 2.75, = 0.54; 90-day SMD = -2.29, 95%CI: -4.94, 0.37, = 0.09). Sensitivity analyses showed that patients in Asia had improved survival (30-day OR = 2.76, 95%CI: 1.43, 5.35, = 0.003; 60-day OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.39, 5.73, = 0.004; 90-day OR = 2.92, 95% CI: 1.34, 6.36, = 0.007). Our findings suggest that, currently, G-CSF cannot be recommended for the treatment of ACLF.
粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)已被提议作为治疗慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的一种选择。然而,其临床疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在综合关于G-CSF在ACLF中疗效的现有证据。检索了Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间从建库至2021年9月。在对纳入文献进行定性评估后,对纳入研究进行了分析。本荟萃分析纳入了7项研究。总体而言,G-CSF治疗与死亡风险降低无关(30天生存率,OR = 1.55,95%CI:1.00,2.38,P = 0.05;60天生存率,OR = 1.50,95%CI:0.95,2.36,P = 0.08;90天生存率,OR = 1.61,95%CI:0.99,2.62,P = 0.05),也与并发症无关,包括感染的发生(OR = 0.66,95%CI:0.41,1.05,P = 0.08)、出血(OR = 1.50,95%CI:0.58,3.89,P = 0.41)和肝肾综合征(OR = 0.56,95%CI:0.25,1.24,P = 0.15)。此外,它对终末期肝病评分没有明显的有益影响(30天标准化均值差 = -3.31,95%CI:-7.42,0.81,P = 0.12;60天标准化均值差 = -1.23,95%CI:-5.21,2.75,P = 0.54;90天标准化均值差 = -2.29,95%CI:-4.94,0.37,P = 0.09)。敏感性分析表明,亚洲患者的生存率有所提高(30天OR = 2.76,95%CI:1.43,5.35,P = 0.003;60天OR = 2.83,95%CI:1.39,5.73,P = 0.004;90天OR = 2.92,95%CI:1.34,6.36,P = 0.007)。我们的研究结果表明,目前,不建议使用G-CSF治疗ACLF。