• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膝关节骨关节炎早期单剂量与多剂量关节腔内注射富血小板血浆的单盲、随机、优效性试验

Single versus multi-dose intra-articular injection of platelet rich plasma in early stages of osteoarthritis of the knee: A single-blind, randomized, superiority trial.

作者信息

Subramanyam Koushik, Alguvelly Rajkumar, Mundargi Abhishek, Khanchandani Prakash

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences - Prashanthigram, Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Arch Rheumatol. 2021 Jan 14;36(3):326-334. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.8408. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.8408
PMID:34870163
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8612497/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of single, double, and triple doses of intra-articular (IA) platelet rich plasma (PRP) in early stages of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-blind, randomized, superiority trial included a total of 180 knees of 90 patients (22 males, 68 females; mean age: 47.9 years; range, 36 to 60 years) with bilateral OA knee of Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 1-2 between May 2017 and December 2018. The patients were randomized (30 in each group) to receive single, double, or triple doses of IA PRP (two weeks apart in repeat injections). The outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner Lysholm Knee Score. The assessor of outcome was blinded. The scores were collected before intervention and at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year after the intervention.

RESULTS

All patients completed the study. All three groups were comparable with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. All four scores were comparable among the three groups before intervention and at six weeks, three months, and six months. However, at one-year follow-up, the three-dose group showed superiority to others in terms of all four scores. All three groups showed improvement until six months and deterioration thereafter, which was only marginal in the three-dose group. All groups showed a statistically significant improvement of scores compared to baseline scores at one year. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSION

The IA administration of three doses of PRP yields superior outcome to single and double doses at the end of one year. Repeat doses are probably needed to sustain the benefit achieved at one year.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较单剂量、双剂量和三剂量关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗膝关节早期骨关节炎(OA)的有效性。

患者与方法

本单盲、随机、优效性试验纳入了2017年5月至2018年12月期间90例双侧Kellgren-Lawrence 1-2级OA膝关节患者(男22例,女68例;平均年龄47.9岁;范围36至60岁)的180个膝关节。患者被随机分组(每组30例),接受单剂量、双剂量或三剂量关节内注射PRP(重复注射间隔两周)。观察指标为视觉模拟评分、国际膝关节文献委员会评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分以及Tegner Lysholm膝关节评分。结果评估者为盲法。在干预前以及干预后6周、3个月、6个月和1年收集评分。

结果

所有患者均完成研究。三组在人口统计学和疾病特征方面具有可比性。干预前以及6周、3个月和6个月时,三组的所有四项评分均具有可比性。然而,在1年随访时,三剂量组在所有四项评分方面均优于其他组。所有三组在6个月前均显示改善,此后恶化,三剂量组的恶化程度较小。与基线评分相比,所有组在1年时评分均有统计学意义的改善。未出现重大并发症。

结论

关节内注射三剂量PRP在1年末的疗效优于单剂量和双剂量。可能需要重复给药以维持1年时获得的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a30c/8612497/75310c6ef11c/AR-2021-36-3-326-334-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a30c/8612497/75310c6ef11c/AR-2021-36-3-326-334-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a30c/8612497/75310c6ef11c/AR-2021-36-3-326-334-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Single versus multi-dose intra-articular injection of platelet rich plasma in early stages of osteoarthritis of the knee: A single-blind, randomized, superiority trial.膝关节骨关节炎早期单剂量与多剂量关节腔内注射富血小板血浆的单盲、随机、优效性试验
Arch Rheumatol. 2021 Jan 14;36(3):326-334. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.8408. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Single intra-articular injection with or without intra-osseous injections of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of osteoarthritis knee: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial.单关节内注射或联合骨内注射富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎:一项单盲、随机临床试验。
Injury. 2022 Mar;53(3):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
The effectiveness of leucocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma injections on symptomatic early osteoarthritis of the knee: the PEAK randomized controlled trial.贫白细胞富血小板血浆注射治疗膝关节早期症状性骨关节炎的疗效:PEAK 随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jun;104-B(6):663-671. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2021-1109.R2.
4
Multiple PRP injections are more effective than single injections and hyaluronic acid in knees with early osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.多次注射富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗早期膝骨关节炎比单次注射及注射透明质酸更有效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):958-965. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3705-6. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
5
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results at 5 Years of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆与透明质酸注射治疗膝骨关节炎:一项 5 年双盲、随机对照试验的结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):347-354. doi: 10.1177/0363546518814532. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
6
Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-articular Knee Injections Show No Superiority Versus Viscosupplementation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆膝关节腔内注射与关节腔注射透明质酸钠相比无优势:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1575-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515582027. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.透明质酸与富血小板血浆:一项比较临床结果及对膝关节骨关节炎关节内生物学影响的前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):339-346. doi: 10.1177/0363546516665809. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Intra-articular Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma Is Superior to Hyaluronic Acid or Saline Solution in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Triple-Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.富血小板血浆关节内注射治疗轻中度膝骨关节炎优于透明质酸或生理盐水:一项随机、双盲、三平行、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jan;35(1):106-117. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.035.
9
The comparison effects of intra-articular injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), Plasma Rich in Growth Factor (PRGF), Hyaluronic Acid (HA), and ozone in knee osteoarthritis; a one year randomized clinical trial.富血小板血浆(PRP)、富含生长因子的血浆(PRGF)、透明质酸(HA)和臭氧关节内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的比较效果:一项为期一年的随机临床试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 3;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04017-x.
10
Intra-articular injection of Platelet rich plasma versus Hyaluronic acid for moderate knee osteoarthritis. A prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial on 189 patients with follow-up for three years.关节内注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗中度膝骨关节炎。一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验,共纳入 189 例患者,随访 3 年。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2021 Dec;87(4):729-734. doi: 10.52628/87.4.18.

引用本文的文献

1
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Painful Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆注射治疗疼痛性第一掌腕关节骨关节炎:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Jun 6;10(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00027. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Efficacy of multiple autologous apheresis platelet-rich plasma injections for treating knee osteoarthritis and its influencing factors: a retrospective cohort study.多次自体单采富血小板血浆注射治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效及其影响因素:一项回顾性队列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 4;20(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05756-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Platelet-rich plasma injections delay the need for knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study and survival analysis.富血小板血浆注射延缓膝关节置换的需求:一项回顾性研究和生存分析。
Int Orthop. 2021 Feb;45(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04669-9. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
2
Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单次与多次注射富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec 16;7(12):2325967119887116. doi: 10.1177/2325967119887116. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Preoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Decrease Inflammatory and Chondrodegenerative Biomarkers in Patients With Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
术前注射富血小板血浆可降低急性前交叉韧带撕裂患者的炎症和软骨退变生物标志物:一项初步随机对照试验。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Mar 3;13(3):23259671241312754. doi: 10.1177/23259671241312754. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Comparative efficacy of different doses of platelet-rich plasma injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同剂量富血小板血浆注射治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 1;20(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05650-1.
5
Optimal Dosage of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Scoping Review.膝关节骨关节炎患者富血小板血浆注射的最佳剂量:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Dec 10;16(12):e75497. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75497. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Randomized Controlled Trials for Platelet-Rich Plasma Use in Knee Osteoarthritis Rarely Report Key Sociodemographic Patient Variables: A Scoping Review.用于膝关节骨关节炎的富血小板血浆的随机对照试验很少报告关键的社会人口统计学患者变量:一项范围综述。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug 23;6(6):100988. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100988. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
High-concentrated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus placebo in osteoarthritis in the thumb base: study protocol for an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.高浓度富血小板血浆(PRP)与安慰剂治疗拇指基底骨关节炎的比较:一项评估者盲法随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 26;25(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08636-2.
8
Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Rotator Cuff Injuries: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.富血小板血浆疗法治疗肩袖损伤:当前证据与未来方向的综合综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70042. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
The Effect of Platelet Dose on Outcomes after Platelet Rich Plasma Injections for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血小板剂量对用于肌肉骨骼疾病的富血小板血浆注射后结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Dec;17(12):570-588. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09922-x. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
10
Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections from open preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection: A systematic review of 91 randomized controlled trials and 5914 injections.开放性制备技术的富血小板血浆膝关节腔内注射不会带来更高的关节感染风险:对91项随机对照试验和5914次注射的系统评价
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Sep 23;11(3):e70002. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70002. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Single- and double-dose of platelet-rich plasma hyaluronic acid for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.
单剂量和双剂量富血小板血浆联合透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎:一项随机对照试验。
World J Orthop. 2019 Sep 18;10(9):310-326. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.310.
4
Multiple Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Versus Single Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Early Osteoarthritis of the Knee: An Experimental Study in a Guinea Pig Model of Early Knee Osteoarthritis.多剂量富血小板血浆注射与单剂量富血小板血浆注射治疗早期膝骨关节炎的比较:早期膝骨关节炎豚鼠模型的实验研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2300-2307. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856605. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
5
Intraarticular injection of platelet-rich plasma in knee osteoarthritis: single versus triple application approach. Pilot study.膝关节骨关节炎关节腔内注射富血小板血浆:单次注射与三次注射方法比较。初步研究。
Acta Reumatol Port. 2019 Apr-Jun;44(2):138-144.
6
Comparison of Efficiency Between Corticosteroid and Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Therapies in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎患者中皮质类固醇与富血小板血浆注射疗法的疗效比较
Arch Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 2;33(3):273-281. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2018.6608. eCollection 2018 Sep.
7
Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.生物制剂治疗膝骨关节炎。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):801-813. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Toward classification criteria for early osteoarthritis of the knee.膝关节早期骨关节炎的分类标准研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Feb;47(4):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Short-term clinical results of intra-articular PRP injections for early osteoarthritis of the knee.关节内注射富血小板血浆治疗膝关节早期骨关节炎的短期临床疗效。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jun;42:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.067. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Evidence and recommendations for use of intra-articular injections for knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎关节内注射的证据和建议。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun;59(3):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Apr 18.