• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开展并批判性评价一项有关 COVID-19 的高质量系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Conducting and critically appraising a high-quality systematic review and Meta-analysis pertaining to COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Radiology and Endovascular Interventions, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Feb;38(2):317-325. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.2015160. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2021.2015160
PMID:34870545
Abstract

With constantly emerging new information regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), reviewing literature related to it has become increasingly complicated and resource-intensive. In the setting of this global pandemic, clinical decisions are being guided by the results of multiple pertinent studies; however, it has been observed that these studies are often heterogenous in design and population characteristics and results of initial trials may not be replicated in subsequent studies. The resulting clinical conundrum can be resolved by high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis with a robust and reliable methodology, encapsulating and critically appraising all the available literature relevant to the clinical scenario under scrutiny. It can condense the large volume of scientific information available and can also identify the cause of differences in the degree of effect under consideration across different studies. It can identify optimal diagnostic algorithms, assess efficacy of treatment strategies, and analyze inherent factors influencing the efficacy of treatment for COVID-19. The current review aims to provide a basic guide to plan and conduct a high-quality systematic review and meta-analysis pertaining to COVID-19, describing the main steps and addressing the pitfalls commonly encountered at each step. Knowledge of the basic steps would also allow the reader to critically appraise published systematic review and meta-analysis and the quality of evidence provided therein.

摘要

随着有关 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的流行病学、发病机制、诊断和管理的新信息不断涌现,相关文献的回顾变得越来越复杂和耗费资源。在全球大流行的背景下,临床决策受到多项相关研究结果的指导;然而,人们观察到这些研究在设计和人群特征上往往存在异质性,初始试验的结果在后续研究中可能无法复制。通过采用高质量、稳健可靠的方法进行系统评价和荟萃分析,可以解决由此产生的临床难题,该方法可以总结所有与正在研究的临床情况相关的现有文献,并对其进行批判性评估。它可以浓缩大量的科学信息,还可以确定在不同研究中考虑的不同效应程度的差异的原因。它可以确定最佳的诊断算法,评估治疗策略的疗效,并分析影响 COVID-19 治疗效果的内在因素。本综述旨在为 COVID-19 的高质量系统评价和荟萃分析的计划和实施提供基本指南,描述主要步骤,并解决每个步骤中常见的陷阱。了解基本步骤还可以使读者批判性地评估已发表的系统评价和荟萃分析及其提供的证据质量。

相似文献

1
Conducting and critically appraising a high-quality systematic review and Meta-analysis pertaining to COVID-19.开展并批判性评价一项有关 COVID-19 的高质量系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Feb;38(2):317-325. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.2015160. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Effectiveness of the non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19; a protocol of a systematic review and realist review.非药物性公共卫生干预措施防治 COVID-19 的效果:一项系统评价和实际研究方案。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 29;15(9):e0239554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239554. eCollection 2020.
4
Mesenchymal stromal cells as a therapeutic intervention for COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.间充质基质细胞作为 COVID-19 的治疗干预措施:一项实时系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;10(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01803-5.
5
Epidemiology, methodological quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study.2019 年冠状病毒病的系统评价和荟萃分析的流行病学、方法学质量和报告特征:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 24;100(47):e27950. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027950.
6
Effectiveness of tests to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus, and antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, to inform COVID-19 diagnosis: a rapid systematic review.检测 SARS-CoV-2 病毒及 SARS-CoV-2 抗体以辅助 COVID-19 诊断的有效性:一项快速系统综述。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Feb;27(1):33-45. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111511. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Chemoprophylaxis trial designs in epidemics: insights from a systematic review of COVID-19 study registrations.传染病化学预防试验设计:从 COVID-19 研究注册的系统评价中得到的启示。
Trials. 2021 May 29;22(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05323-4.
8
Prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with breast cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌患者感染新型冠状病毒肺炎的预后:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21487. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021487.
9
Evidence-Based Risk Mitigation and Stratification During COVID-19 for Return to Interventional Pain Practice: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.COVID-19 期间重返介入性疼痛实践的循证风险缓解和分层:美国介入性疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)指南。
Pain Physician. 2020 Aug;23(4S):S161-S182.
10
Prevalence and characteristics of fever in adult and paediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 17515 patients.成人和儿科 COVID-19 患者发热的患病率和特征:对 17515 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 6;16(4):e0249788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249788. eCollection 2021.