• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中识别鼻窦癌:使用电子病历的匹配病例对照研究。

Recognizing sinonasal cancer in primary care: a matched case-control study using electronic records.

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, United Kingdom.

College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, College House, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2022 May 28;39(3):354-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab153.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmab153
PMID:34871409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9155150/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancers of the nasopharynx, nasal cavity, and accessory sinuses ("sinonasal") are rare in England, with around 750 patients diagnosed annually. There are no specific National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) referral guidelines for these cancers and no primary care research published.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and quantify clinical features of sinonasal cancer in UK primary care patients.

METHODS

This matched case-control study used UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data. Patients were aged ≥40 years with a diagnosis of sinonasal cancer between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009 and had consulted their GP in the year before diagnosis. Clinical features of sinonasal cancer were analysed using conditional logistic regression. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for single and combined features were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 155 cases and 697 controls were studied. Nine symptoms and one abnormal investigation were significantly associated with the cancer: nasal mass; odds ratio, 95 (95% confidence interval 7.0, 1315, P = 0.001); head and neck lumps, 68 (12, 387, P < 0.001); epistaxis, 17 (3.9, 70, P < 0.001); rhinorrhoea, 14 (4.6, 44, P < 0.001); visual disturbance, 12 (2.2, 67, P = 0.004); sinusitis, 7.3 (2.2, 25, P = 0.001); sore throat, 6.0 (2.0, 18, P = 0.001); otalgia, 5.4 (1.6, 18, P = 0.007); headache, 3.6 (1.4, 9.5, P = 0.01); raised white cell count, 8.5 (2.8, 27, P < 0.001). Combined PPVs for epistaxis/rhinorrhoea, epistaxis/sinusitis, and rhinorrhoea/sinusitis were 0.62%.

CONCLUSION

This is the first primary care study identifying epistaxis, sinusitis, and rhinorrhoea as part of the clinical prodrome of sinonasal cancer. Although no PPVs meet the 3% NICE referral threshold, these results may help clinicians identify who warrants safety-netting and possible specialist referral, potentially reducing the number of advanced-stage diagnoses of sinonasal cancer.

摘要

背景

在英格兰,鼻咽癌、鼻腔和副鼻窦(“鼻-鼻窦”)癌症的发病率较低,每年约有 750 名患者被确诊。目前尚无针对这些癌症的英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)特定转诊指南,也没有发表过初级保健研究。

目的

确定并量化英国初级保健患者中鼻-鼻窦癌症的临床特征。

方法

本匹配病例对照研究使用了英国临床实践研究数据库(CPRD)的数据。患者年龄≥40 岁,在 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间被诊断患有鼻-鼻窦癌,且在诊断前一年曾就诊于他们的全科医生。使用条件逻辑回归分析鼻-鼻窦癌症的临床特征。计算了单一和联合特征的阳性预测值(PPV)。

结果

共纳入了 155 例病例和 697 例对照。有 9 种症状和 1 种异常检查结果与癌症显著相关:鼻部肿块;比值比,95(95%置信区间 7.0,1315,P=0.001);头颈部肿块,68(12,387,P<0.001);鼻出血,17(3.9,70,P<0.001);流涕,14(4.6,44,P<0.001);视力障碍,12(2.2,67,P=0.004);鼻窦炎,7.3(2.2,25,P=0.001);咽痛,6.0(2.0,18,P=0.001);耳痛,5.4(1.6,18,P=0.007);头痛,3.6(1.4,9.5,P=0.01);白细胞计数升高,8.5(2.8,27,P<0.001)。鼻出血/流涕、鼻出血/鼻窦炎和流涕/鼻窦炎联合的 PPV 分别为 0.62%。

结论

这是第一项确定鼻出血、鼻窦炎和流涕是鼻-鼻窦癌临床前驱期一部分的初级保健研究。虽然没有任何 PPV 达到 NICE 3%的转诊阈值,但这些结果可能有助于临床医生识别哪些患者需要加强监测和可能的专科转诊,从而减少晚期鼻-鼻窦癌症的诊断数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a61/9155150/3fd9f9293dfc/cmab153f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a61/9155150/3fd9f9293dfc/cmab153f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a61/9155150/3fd9f9293dfc/cmab153f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Recognizing sinonasal cancer in primary care: a matched case-control study using electronic records.初级保健中识别鼻窦癌:使用电子病历的匹配病例对照研究。
Fam Pract. 2022 May 28;39(3):354-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab153.
2
Recognising laryngeal cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.初级保健中喉癌的识别:一项使用电子病历的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):e127-e133. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700997. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
Selection of men for investigation of possible testicular cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic patient records.初级保健中疑似睾丸癌男性的选择:一项使用电子患者记录的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Aug;68(673):e559-e565. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X697949. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records.基层医疗中有症状女性患乳腺癌的风险:一项利用电子记录的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e788-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682873.
5
Risk of uterine cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: case-control study using electronic records.初级保健中症状性妇女的子宫癌风险:使用电子病历的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;63(614):e643-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671632.
6
Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case-control study using electronic records.通过初级保健患者报告的症状量化多发性骨髓瘤的风险:一项使用电子记录的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Feb;65(631):e106-13. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683545.
7
Predictive value of abnormal blood tests for detecting cancer in primary care patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms: A population-based cohort study of 477,870 patients in England.异常血液检查对初级保健中具有非特异性腹部症状的患者癌症检测的预测价值:一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入了英格兰 477870 例患者。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jul 30;21(7):e1004426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004426. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Quantifying the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in symptomatic primary care patients aged ≥40 years: a large case-control study using electronic records.对40岁及以上有症状的初级保健患者非霍奇金淋巴瘤风险进行量化:一项使用电子记录的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e281-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684793.
9
Quantifying the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma in symptomatic primary care patients aged ≥40 years: a case-control study using electronic records.量化40岁及以上有症状的初级保健患者患霍奇金淋巴瘤的风险:一项使用电子记录的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 May;65(634):e289-94. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X684805.
10
Risk of childhood cancer with symptoms in primary care: a population-based case-control study.基层医疗中出现症状的儿童癌症风险:一项基于人群的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e22-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660742.

本文引用的文献

1
GPs' use of gut feelings when assessing cancer risk: a qualitative study in UK primary care.全科医生在评估癌症风险时对直觉的运用:英国初级医疗保健的一项定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Apr 29;71(706):e356-e363. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X714269. Print 2021 May.
2
Nasal obstruction: a common presentation in primary care.鼻塞:基层医疗中的常见症状。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):628-629. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707057. Print 2019 Dec.
3
Unilateral versus bilateral sinonasal disease: Considerations in differential diagnosis and workup.
单侧与双侧鼻-鼻窦疾病:鉴别诊断和检查中的考虑因素。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Apr;130(4):E116-E121. doi: 10.1002/lary.28108. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
Rates of symptomatology are lower in recurrent sinonasal malignancy than in other recurrent cancers of the head and neck: a multi-institutional study.复发性头颈部肿瘤中,症状发生率低于其他复发性头颈部肿瘤:一项多机构研究。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Jun;9(6):688-694. doi: 10.1002/alr.22310. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
Recognising laryngeal cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.初级保健中喉癌的识别:一项使用电子病历的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Feb;69(679):e127-e133. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700997. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
Selection of men for investigation of possible testicular cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic patient records.初级保健中疑似睾丸癌男性的选择:一项使用电子患者记录的大型病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Aug;68(673):e559-e565. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X697949. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A review of current updates.鼻咽癌:当前进展综述
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Apr;15(4):3687-3692. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5878. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
8
Sinonasal adenocarcinoma: clinical outcomes and predictive factors.鼻窦腺癌:临床结局与预测因素。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):422-427. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
Nose and paranasal sinus tumours: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.鼻及鼻窦肿瘤:英国国家多学科指南
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S111-S118. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000530.
10
Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case-control study.在临床实践研究数据链研究中,遗漏自由文本记录是否可能成为数据丢失和偏差的一个来源?一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e011664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011664.