乳腺钼靶摄影与透照光扫描在乳腺病变检测中的比较。

Comparison of mammography and transillumination light scanning in the detection of breast lesions.

作者信息

Gisvold J J, Brown L R, Swee R G, Raygor D J, Dickerson N, Ranfranz M K

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Jul;147(1):191-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.1.191.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.147.1.191

Abstract

A prospective study was done involving 822 women who had both film screen mammography and a breast transillumination light scan examination. The study population was not randomized; a modified phase-2 study was done. Mammography was superior for detecting malignancy: of the 67 pathologically proved breast cancers, 64 (95.5%) were detected by mammography and 45 (67.2%) were detected by transillumination. Biopsy revealed that 74 patients had benign lesions. In this group of patients, the false-positive rate was 12.2% for light scanning and 79.7% for mammography; however, 117 other patients had false-positive light scans.

摘要

一项前瞻性研究纳入了822名接受了乳腺钼靶摄影和乳腺透照光扫描检查的女性。研究人群未进行随机分组；开展的是一项改良的2期研究。钼靶摄影在检测恶性肿瘤方面更具优势：在67例经病理证实的乳腺癌中，64例（95.5%）通过钼靶摄影检测到，45例（67.2%）通过透照检测到。活检显示74例患者有良性病变。在这组患者中，透照扫描的假阳性率为12.2%，钼靶摄影的假阳性率为79.7%；然而，另有117例患者透照扫描出现假阳性。