Castelle A J, Johnson A W, Conolly C
Adolfson Associates, 5309 Shilshole Ave. N.W., Seattle, WA, 98107.
Aquatic Resource Consultants, 1606 Nob Hill Ave. N., Seattle, WA, 98109.
J Environ Qual. 1994 Sep;23(5):878-882. doi: 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300050004x.
Upland vegetated buffers are widely regarded as being necessary to protect wetlands, streams, and other aquatic resources. Buffer size requirements, however, have typically been established by political acceptability, not scientific merit. This often leads to insufficiently buffered aquatic resources. In order to assist public agencies in formulating appropriate buffer standards, we conducted a literature search of the scientific functions of buffers. The literature search reconfirmed the need for buffers and emphasized the importance of considering specific buffer functions. A range of buffer widths from 3 m to 200 m was found to be effective, depending on site-specific conditions; a buffer of at least 15 m was found to be necessary to protect wetlands and streams under most conditions.
高地植被缓冲带被广泛认为是保护湿地、溪流和其他水生资源所必需的。然而,缓冲带大小的要求通常是由政治可接受性决定的,而非科学依据。这常常导致对水生资源的缓冲不足。为了协助公共机构制定适当的缓冲标准,我们对缓冲带的科学功能进行了文献检索。文献检索再次证实了缓冲带的必要性,并强调了考虑特定缓冲功能的重要性。根据具体场地条件,发现3米至200米的一系列缓冲带宽度都是有效的;在大多数情况下,发现至少15米的缓冲带对于保护湿地和溪流是必要的。