Suppr超能文献

一项随机临床试验:椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉用于肺叶切除术患者术后镇痛的最佳策略:比较不同前锯肌平面阻滞入路效果的比较。

A randomized clinical trial: optimal strategies of paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lobectomy: a comparison of the effects of different approaches for serratus anterior plane block.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin, China.

Department of Pain, Tianjin Port Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;10(11):11464-11472. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2597.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To observe the analgesic effect of different ultrasound-guided methods of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) after surgery in patients who have undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy with general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients aged 18-65 years old scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were selected. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SPB) group and continuous serratus anterior plane block (CSPB) group (n=40 each). All patients were treated with general anesthesia combined with double-point (T4, T7) thoracic paravertebral block. The SPB group received an ultrasound-guided single serratus plane block. The CSPB group underwent the same procedure as the SPB group, with an epidural catheter inserted. Both the PCIA and SPB groups received PCIA after surgery. Patients in the CSPB group were connected to a continuous serratus block automatic analgesia pump after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of the general condition. Compared with the PCIA group, the resting and exercise VAS pain scores at T2, T3, T4, and T5, cortisol level at T1, T4 and T5 in SPB group and CSPB group were lower (P<0.05), the times of the first analgesia were significantly prolonged, and the times of pressing the PCA pump and opioid use were significantly less in the SPB and CSPB groups, and the CSPB group used no opioids (P<0.05), the SPB group and CSPB group had shorter times of the first postoperative activity, longer mobilization distance and the total number of days in hospital was significantly lower (P<0.05). Postoperative complications in the SPB and CSPB groups were significantly less and the CSPB group had an even lower incidence of postoperative complications (P<0.05). Compared with the SPB group, active VAS pain scores at T4 and T5 were higher in the CSPB group (P<0.05). Compared with the PCIA group, the total QoR-40 score at T6 was significantly higher in the SPB and CSPB groups, and compared with the SPB group, this data was higher in the CSPB group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Single ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with PCIA can provide a better analgesic effect, improve the quality of early postoperative recovery, and accelerate ERAS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000041350.

摘要

背景

观察全麻联合胸椎旁神经阻滞下不同超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)在胸腔镜肺叶切除术后的镇痛效果。

方法

选择 120 例 18-65 岁择期行电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的患者。患者随机分为 3 组:患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)组、前锯肌平面阻滞(SPB)组和连续前锯肌平面阻滞(CSPB)组(每组 40 例)。所有患者均采用全身麻醉联合双点(T4、T7)胸椎旁阻滞。SPB 组行超声引导下单次前锯肌平面阻滞。CSPB 组行相同操作,留置硬膜外导管。PCIA 组和 SPB 组术后均行 PCIA。CSPB 组术后连接连续前锯肌阻滞自动镇痛泵。

结果

三组患者一般情况比较差异无统计学意义。与 PCIA 组比较,SPB 组和 CSPB 组在 T2、T3、T4、T5 时的静息和运动 VAS 疼痛评分、T1、T4、T5 时皮质醇水平均较低(P<0.05),首次镇痛时间明显延长,PCIA 按压次数和阿片类药物用量明显减少,CSPB 组未使用阿片类药物(P<0.05),SPB 组和 CSPB 组术后首次活动时间、术后活动距离和住院总天数明显缩短(P<0.05)。SPB 组和 CSPB 组术后并发症明显减少,CSPB 组术后并发症发生率更低(P<0.05)。与 SPB 组比较,CSPB 组 T4、T5 时主动 VAS 疼痛评分较高(P<0.05)。与 PCIA 组比较,SPB 组和 CSPB 组在 T6 时的 QoR-40 总评分均明显升高,CSPB 组高于 SPB 组(P<0.05)。

结论

单次超声引导下 SAPB 联合 PCIA 可提供更好的镇痛效果,提高术后早期恢复质量,加速 ERAS。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR2000041350。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验