Collective Health Institute, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, BA, Brazil
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Dec;21(4):6652. doi: 10.22605/RRH6652. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
Specialized care barriers are widespread and multifactorial, with consequences for timely access, health outcomes, and equity, especially in rural contexts. This article aims to identify and analyze arrangements for providing specialized care in the Brazilian remote rural municipalities (RRMs).
This is a multiple-case qualitative case study developed in seven RRMs located in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the public health system managers, complemented by analysis of secondary data from national health information systems. Thematic content analysis was guided by the Integrated Health Service Network attributes related to the provision of specialized care.
Socioeconomic indicators and indicators of availability and accessibility to health services express the context of greater vulnerability of RRM and their respective health regions when compared to states and the country. The analyzed cases do not come close to the RISS constitutive attributes. Various arrangements for the provision and financing of specialized care in the RRM were identified: public provision through an agreement between managers in the health region, health consortia, public provision in the municipality itself or neighboring municipalities, provision in private health services through direct purchase (out-of-pocket), and telehealth (very incipient). Such arrangements were unable to respond quantitatively and qualitatively to the demand for specialized care. Providing timely specialized care in an adequate place is not achieved, resulting in a fragmented, low-resolution model. The fragility of regionalized networks, aggravated by underfunding of the Brazilian Unified Health System, insufficient logistical support, and computerization of health services, contributes to care gaps and unacceptably long travel times for common specialized procedures, with more severe effects for people residing in the rural areas of the municipalities.
Brazil's disorganization or lack of a systemic response based on regionalized health networks generates several care improvisations. The less structured the RISS, the more informal arrangements are made, with gains for the private sector to the detriment of public health system users.
专门护理障碍普遍存在且具有多方面性,对及时获得医疗服务、健康结果和公平性都有影响,尤其是在农村地区。本文旨在识别和分析巴西偏远农村地区(RRMs)提供专门护理的安排。
这是一项在巴西半干旱地区的七个 RRMs 中进行的多案例定性案例研究。对公共卫生系统管理人员进行了 22 次半结构化访谈,同时对国家卫生信息系统的二级数据进行了分析。主题内容分析以与专门护理提供相关的综合卫生服务网络属性为指导。
社会经济指标以及卫生服务的可用性和可及性指标表明,与州和国家相比,RRM 及其各自的卫生区域处于更大的脆弱性背景下。分析的案例与 RISS 的构成属性相差甚远。在 RRMs 中确定了各种专门护理的提供和融资安排:通过卫生区域管理者之间的协议提供公共服务、卫生联盟、在自治市本身或邻近自治市提供公共服务、通过直接购买(自掏腰包)提供私立卫生服务,以及远程医疗(非常初期)。这些安排在数量和质量上都无法满足专门护理的需求。无法在适当的地方及时提供专门护理,导致服务模式碎片化且分辨率低。区域化网络的脆弱性,加上巴西统一卫生系统资金不足、后勤支持不足以及卫生服务的计算机化,导致了护理差距和对常见专门程序的不可接受的长旅行时间,对居住在自治市农村地区的人影响更为严重。
巴西缺乏基于区域化卫生网络的系统响应或组织混乱,导致了多种护理的临时措施。RISS 越不规范,就越会采用非正式的安排,私营部门获得更多收益,而公共卫生系统用户则受到损失。